From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somerset, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics connected with Somerset. If you would like to participate, you can visit the WikiProject Somerset project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
| Stub |
This article has been rated as Stub-Class. |
| Mid |
This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale. |
 |
This article is within the scope of the UK Waterways WikiProject.
This is a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the UK's canals and navigable rivers. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.
|
| Stub |
This page has been rated as stub-Class on the quality scale. |
| Low |
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. |
[edit] On the towpath?
Does that stack up? Present-day canals have a waterway maybe 15 plus feet wide and a towpath maybe 6 feet wide. It's difficult to imagine closing the canal and building a railway requiring say 15 feet of formation on the towpath. Obviously they would have wanted to avoid any earthworks they could, but wouldn't they have been forced to drain the canal and level the towpath into the bed of it to make a flat solum?
Afterbrunel 06:13, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- No. The railway was built along the bank. The canal was used to transport material for the railway. Could also have been used to remove spoil.Geni 21:16, 28 June 2007 (UTC)