Talk:George Zweig

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Biography Portal
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Science and academia work group.
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
WikiProject Physics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating within physics.

Help with this template This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Physics because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{Physics}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{Physics}} template, removing {{Physics}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

It says he's a particle physicist, he's categorized as an American physicist...why is it wrong to make it a physicist stub? --Etacar11 01:13, 22 August 2005 (UTC)

  • If I add the stub tags for both physicist and biologist, would that be agreeable? --Etacar11 01:23, 22 August 2005 (UTC)


[edit] 4 aces (Zweig) or 3 quarks (Gell-Mann)

The article implies Zweig thought there were 4 quarks. Wasn't Zweig incorrect? Isn't this why Gell-Mann got the Nobel and Zweig didn't? --Michael C. Price talk 06:22, 16 March 2008 (UTC)