Talk:Geophysics
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics. |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale. |
| High | This article is on a subject of high importance within physics. |
|
Help with this template This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
|
 |
Geophysics is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. |
| Top | This article has been rated as top-importance on the importance scale. |
 |
Please help improve this article or section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. (January 2007) |
Some suggestions: - Include Teluric (MT, AMT,...) as an EM method into pure geophysics of the solid earth. - I think mineral physics should read minerals/rock physics and is also part of "pure" geophysics
In general I think we should say good-bye to the split between pure(theoretical) and applied geophysics. Some of the applied methods use more theoretical background than the classic/pure geophysicist can handle...
I also think oceanography and meteorology should be mentioned but have their own "main page".
---
In my opinion meteorology and oceanography are treated as independent subjects, closely related to, but not part of geophysics. Knowledge and research have become so immense, that they warrant a discipline of their own.
Yes and no. The theoretical side of atmospheric science is treated as a classic example of geophysical fluid dynamics- i.e. the application of the physics of fluids to the Earth system. In that sense, the theoretical side of meteorology is very much a branch of geophysics. However, meteorology and oceanograpy are also independent subjects and should (and do) have their own entries.
---
I suggest the following scheme:
Geophysics, the study of the earth by quantitative physical methods.
- Geophysics of the Atmosphere (Meteorology, climatology, upper air physics)
o Atmospheric electricity and terrestrial magnetism (including ionosphere
and Van Allen belt)
o Meteorology and Climatology, which both involve studies of the weather.
o Aeronomy, the study of the physical structure and chemistry of the
atmosphere.
- Geophysics of the oceans
o Physical Oceanography
- Geophysics of the solid Earth
+ Pure Geophysics
o Seismology (earthquakes and elastic waves)
o Gravity and geodesy (the earth's gravitational field and the size and
form of the earth)
o Geomagnetism (diurnal variations, dynamo theories)
o Geothermometry (heating of the earth, heat flow, volcanology,
and hot springs)
o Hydrology and glaciology (ground water, surface water and ice)
o Tectonophysics (dynamic processes in the earth)
+ Applied geophysics (exploration and engineering geophysics)
o Seismics
o electrical and electromagnetic methods
o gravity exploration
o magnetic exploration
o radioactivity
o Geophysical Engineering
o geomatics (applied geodesy)
o mineral physics
(Hans Erren 12:53, 31 August 2006 (UTC))
