Talk:GBK

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject China, a project to improve all China-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other China-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
More information about this article...

[edit] 2007-02-1 Automated pywikipediabot message

This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary.
The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.)

Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary.

Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there.

--CopyToWiktionaryBot 13:28, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Official Code Tables?

Does anyone know of any official coding tables? Implementations differ on details and how many characters are covered. —Długosz —Preceding unsigned comment added by Długosz (talk • contribs) 10:22, February 5, 2007

i took a look at http://www.iana.org/assignments/charset-reg/GBK which seems to make microsofts code page 936 the authoritive definition of GBK at least as far as the IANA is concerned. The "Relationship to other encodings" in this article speaks as if there is some other defintion of GBK which in some way differs from the MS one but does not actually define what that is. http://h30097.www3.hp.com/docs/base_doc/DOCUMENTATION/V51_HTML/MAN/MAN5/0020____.HTM meanwhile claims that "GBK is therefore defined as a normative annex of GB13000.1-93.". This article is getting an {{accuracy}} tag until this issue is resolved. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Plugwash (talk • contribs) 21:12, March 15, 2007

AFAICT GBK has always been defined as identical to Microsoft 936. Of course this varies from gb2312. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.107.0.73 (talk • contribs) 17:50, May 21, 2007