User talk:Gateman1997

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1 Please Leave Me a Message on this page

[edit] Please Leave Me a Message on this page

If you would like to leave me a message please either choose the correct open topic or create a new one at the bottom of the page.

For previous discussions please see the archive, archive 2 archive 3, or archive 4.

[edit] Ground rules

No vandalism.
Be civil. If you're rude I'll return the favor in kind.
Sign your posts for the sanity of all.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

[edit] Calton

I see you have come in contact with Wikipedia's favorite know-it-all. Next time Calton comes around, please just give him one sentence and leave it at that, cause no matter how hard you try, you will never get through to him no matter how right you are. You will just be wasting your breath with him, trust me, I have. If you ever need any help with anything, please drop me a note on my talk page and I will be glad to help you. Rock on...SVRTVDude ^{(Yell - Toil)} 09:49, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, that's kinda the way it goes with him. No real edits, slams anyone making edits that he doesn't like, and berates them endlessly. If you do, though, ever need help with anything (no matter the subject) please let me know and I will be glad to help you out, if I can't, I will find someone who can. Take Care and Rock on...SVRTVDude ^{(Yell - Toil)} 20:32, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Calton has 10,678 mainspace, or "real" edits. For some history between these two, see Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Calton. The "outside views" provide interesting reading. --Tractor kings fan 20:58, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Well it's hard to tell. He looks like he's largely abandoned mainspace edits of late. And he's definitely abandoned WP:CIVIL, WP:AGF, and WP:DICK. Gateman1997 03:40, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

I concede your point on that. --Tractor kings fan 04:39, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Interstate 238

I 100% agree with you that it's not a parent of I-80. However, I don't think any of the five links are really helping your case that much. AA roads and the indigestion page do seem to explicitly state that it's not, but these are both roadgeek fan sites that aren't really reliable sources on the matter. The route log is just a list of routes in numerical order; it doesn't say anything about what's a parent of what. The FAQ-type page doesn't even mention I-238.

That being said, I think the burden of proof is really on the other guy. The article as it's currently written doesn't explicitly state that it isn't (or is) a child of I-80. If he proposes to include I-238 on {{3di 80}}, he's going to have to come up with some source proving his case. -- NORTH ^talk 09:20, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:VeteransAbove.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:VeteransAbove.PNG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:46, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Activity

You did not post an astersisk on Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Newsletter/List. As such, you were considered inactive. Are you currently active in U.S. Roads? --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 21:29, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Dude you're involved with a debate on I238 with me right now. Of course I'm active. I just didn't want the newsletter. Gateman1997 21:29, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] So Weird and Cara DeLizia pages

Regarding your revert of the So Weird & So weird page switch: I can appreciate the potential problems in leaving the history behind - it wasn't my intention to create new problems with the move. However, the placement of the article under the decapitalized entry has been a long-standing error. How would you advise fixing this inaccuracy without moving the entry to the proper page?

Regarding your edit of the Cara DeLizia page: May I ask for what reason you removed the "no free image" graphic? You left no explanation when you made the edit.

Thank you for explaining - I was, in fact, completely oblivious to the presence of a "move" feature. Do you really believe the move would be considered controversial, though? I've never seen any reference to So Weird sans caps anywhere outside of Wikipedia (not in print, on official sites nor fan sites), and I did look for a while to make certain - otherwise I would've done this some time ago, when I first noticed. --Adam the Alien 04:18, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

I've sort of been following this today, so I thought I'd pop up here with a comment or two. I don't understand moves and redirects very well, but in principle I think the article title should be So Weird, because a) the capitalized version seems more common, and b) I've seen a few other titles go by in which the determination was that a lower case logo was merely a design issue, not the correct way to render the title itself. Perhaps we should bring it up on the article's Talk page and see whether there is much resistance to making the change. My experience with the article is that it's had the lower case spelling (inconsistently within the article itself, sometimes) since at least last July when I first looked at it. I'm not sure what the move in February 07 accomplished, but there used to be a note about a technical limitation preventing the article name and first two words from appearing as "so weird". Perhaps February was when that limitation went away? -- Karen | Talk | contribs 05:09, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ah! Related question, then....

If cut and paste is inappropriate, does that also go for spin-off articles, or is that another matter entirely? For example, about two months ago I broke out The Secret Life of Walter Mitty (1947 film) from the article about the short story, because the film material was overwhelming the rest of the article. I then added one of those "see also" templates (For the 1947 film, see The Secret Life of Walter Mitty (1947 film).) to each article. Did I do anything wrong? -- Karen | Talk | contribs 05:29, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Cisco Field Image

I have a higher resolution image that you could use to replace the current image for Cisco Field, if you would like. It is the exact same image, just a larger file. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sdkucera (talk • contribs) 21:05, 1 May 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Stoopid Monkey Logos

As you are probably aware, the Stoop!d Monkey page was the subject of an AfD and the result was, of course, "Keep". Currently, the logos are a point of contention with myself saying that they were part of the "Keep", while User:Calton saying they were to be dropped and the article was to remain.

I asked the admin who closed the AfD his opinion and he replied, "I just said the article was to be kept, I don't know about the logos". There wasn't a decision given on the logos and in the AfD only 3 users said the logos should go, only 1 said keep the article, lose the logos.

I am not sure how to handle this, but since the admin who closed the AfD made no decision and the AfD wasn't about the logos in the first place (and the majority said to keep the logos if you want to be picky about it, as far as I can tell).

This wasn't an issue from April 16th (immediately after the AfD) to May 3rd when User:Calton realized that I was blocked for 48hours (not related to this) and I couldn't revert his changes. User:Calton had no interest and made no changes on the page itself or the talk page during that time. So, to me, his initial revert on May 3rd was done because of my block.

I have asked two admins (in case one is offline) to revert his changes and put a block on the page until this can be worked out. I am also asking you, since you contributed to the AfD, what your opinion is on just the logos themselves. I appericate you input one way or the other. Thanks...SVRTVDude ^(VT)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Familyreunion.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Familyreunion.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:57, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Ports.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ports.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:SJGiantslogo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:SJGiantslogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. fuzzy510 03:39, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:Ports.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ports.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

[edit] Possibly unfree Image:JohnThurmanAbove.PNG

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:JohnThurmanAbove.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 15:31, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] {{California-County-Route-stub}}

We're proposing merging this into {{California-road-stub}} at WP:SFD. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 23:43, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] References

Buck Shaw Stadium has this ^[1] reference and McAfee Coliseum this ^[2] one (the same) .

Rich Farmbrough, 16:36 14 September 2007 (GMT).

[edit] Fair use disputed for Image:Whelen american.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Whelen american.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] USRD Inactivity check and news report

Hello, Gateman1997. We had a few urgent matters to communicate to you:

Please update your information at Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Participants, our new centralized participant list. Those who have not done so by October 20th will be removed.
There are important discussions taking place at WT:USRD relating to whether WP:USRD, WP:HWY, or the state projects should hold the "power" in the roads projects.

Regards, Rschen7754 (T C) 23:19, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Byington Vineyard

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Byington Vineyard, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Agne ^Cheese/^Wine 07:00, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] USRD inactivity notification

You have been declared inactive at USRD. If this is in error, feel free to restore yourself to the list, but only if you are truly active at USRD. Regards, Rschen7754 (T C) 21:17, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Grand west.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Grand west.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:49, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Familyreunion.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Familyreunion.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 17:11, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to [[USS Iowa (BB-61)]]. Thank you. MBK004 01:57, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] San Jose Earthquakes

Version one The San Jose Earthquakes, a professional soccer team located in San Jose, California,

Version two The San Jose Earthquakes are a professional soccer team located in San Jose, California

Every other football team uses version two, undo your edit so it looks like version two.

Happy editing, michfan2123 (talk) 19:09, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Your way doesn't follow the standard format policy, change it or eventually your decision will be overridden. michfan2123 (talk) 19:19, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Whelen american.gif

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:KCMUNI.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:KCMUNI.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Image:MaineRoute9A.GIF listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:MaineRoute9A.GIF, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Scott5114 ↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 04:02, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Popup estate cabernet m.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Popup estate cabernet m.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Buck-shaw-stadium-lg.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Buck-shaw-stadium-lg.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:JLA-Cyberforce.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:JLA-Cyberforce.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Grand west.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Grand west.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:13, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of 2008 Fortune Market 250

An editor has nominated 2008 Fortune Market 250, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008 Fortune Market 250 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 18:59, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CiscoField1.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:CiscoField1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:22, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Atlanticlogo08.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Atlanticlogo08.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:36, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Infobox logos

Whatever your reasons, please stop reverting, and take the issue to Template Talk:Infobox Stadium. I won't revert you again, but if you don't discuss it civilly, and continue to revert others, you risk getting blocked for violating WP:3RR. - BillCJ (talk) 06:13, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Not sure if this is the same issue, but nonetheless...

The fact of the matter is that the infobox is starting to look too awkward. In Rogers Centre, the image of the stadium is actually obscured. The differences in the proportions of different logos doesn't help either. Logos like PNC and Chase Field may loog fine, but tall logos like Nationals Park and Minute Maid Park can be more problematic. With the logo on the opposite side, the infobox looks much tighter. There's no issue with the change save for the occasional small opening paragraphs which cause the table of contents to be moved over, but no introduction (blanking on the correct Wikipedia terminology here) for these ballparks should be that small anyway. I'm planning on going in an straightening a few things up. I was just trying to get all the logos done before I went to bed so I wouldn't get some guy who saw some ballpark logos being different immediately reverting the different ones. Of course, I hadn't thought of football fields. Nonetheless (yes, I used that twice in one conversation), I think the change is a positive change for the aesthetics of the infobox. I wish I'd thought of it when I originally introduced the logos in the infoboxes, but I didn't. --The Silent Wind of Doom (talk) 11:34, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Football club infoboxes

I've created a draft new infobox for football clubs incorporating the features present in the MLS box at {{Infobox Football club2}} (see User:Number 57/Toronto FC for how it displays). Please give your thoughts on WT:FOOTY. Cheers, пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 08:54, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

I've asked someone else to fix that (and hono(u)rs as well), as I'm not sure how to do it. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 16:32, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:QuakesUnis.PNG)

Thanks for uploading Image:QuakesUnis.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 14:15, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Buck-shaw-stadium-lg.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Buck-shaw-stadium-lg.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:06, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:ChathamAs2003.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:ChathamAs2003.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:07, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] One Circuit

Hello, Gateman1997. The Streets of Long Beach circuit map looks great. Could you do a map of Thunderhill Raceway Park? It's a road course that has five roadways to make different configurations. Thank you. Fclass (talk) 19:22, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Request to move article Monster Park incomplete

You recently filed a request at Wikipedia:Requested moves to move the page Monster Park to a different title - however your proposal is either incomplete or has been contested as being controversial. As a result, it has been moved to the incomplete and contested proposals section. Requests that remain incomplete after five days will be removed.

Please make sure you have completed all three of the following:

Added {{move|NewName}} at the top of the talk page of the page you want moved, replacing "NewName" with the new name for the article. This creates the required template for you there.
Added {{subst:RMtalk|NewName|reason for move}} to the bottom of the talk page of the page you want to be moved, to automatically create a discussion section there.
Added {{subst:RMlink|PageName|NewName|reason for move}} to the top of today's section here.

If you need any further guidance, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Requested moves or contact me on my talk page. - JPG-GR (talk) 19:08, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Mediation case.

Hello, I am Atyndall and I have taken on a mediation cabal case Roehl Sybing filed regarding Major League Soccer in hope to help all editors involved to solve your dispute. This discussion will be taking place here and I implore you to please add your opinions on the matter there, I will be researching the issue also but your help in the matter is greatly appreciated. Thankyou. Atyndall93 | talk 10:25, 3 June 2008 (UTC)