Talk:Friedrich Kohlrausch
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
This article is supported by the Science and academia work group. | ||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating within physics. |
|
Help with this template This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
|
{{wikify-date|April 2006}} — ßottesiηi Tell me what's up 03:21, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
The external link leads to a 404 error (Page not found), as does the corresponding link in the German article. Can someone correct the URL so the link works, or should we just remove the link? Dirac66 21:47, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
the second paragraph under 'electrolyte conduction in electrolytes' seems to have been borrowed from [1]. is that valid?? LeaveSleaves 08:11, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
I think you are right; 4 lines of direct quote from the Zeiss site may constitute a copyright violation, as well as duplicating other parts of the article. The new part is the use of AC, so I have removed the rest and kept just a reworded version of the sentence about AC. Dirac66 17:56, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] References
Wilhelm Wien (1910). "Obituary: Friedrich Kohlrausch". Annalen der Physik 336 (3): 449 - 454. doi:.--Stone 10:20, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- I just now added the above reference to the article. The article, as of right now, has no direct references to specific sources. It would be good to have some authoritative ones, such as the above. -- Astrochemist 01:45, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 09:52, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
