User talk:Foxhunt99
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Foxhunt99, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 21:14, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Mormonism, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Alanraywiki (talk) 19:55, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] May 2008
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Joseph Smith, Jr., you will be blocked from editing. Toddst1 (talk) 20:57, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] unblock
[edit] A. Tom Grunfeld
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of A. Tom Grunfeld, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.nyhumanities.org/speakers/adult_audiences/speaker.php?speaker_id=223. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:28, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Melvyn C. Goldstein
A tag has been placed on Melvyn C. Goldstein requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. M173627 (talk) 20:12, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] AIV Report
Content dispute. Consider dispute resolution.
I removed your AIV report as it didn't appear to fit the necessary description of blatant, repeated vandalism. --Bfigura (talk) 20:46, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Tibet. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Tiptoety talk 16:28, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Kilgour-Matas Report
Have you read it? I think it would be worthwhile for you to read it.--Asdfg12345 01:30, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Watch out
watch this case caseEasymem (talk) 19:06, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Blocked
[edit] Speedy deletion of Serfdom in Tibet
Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 12:26, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

