Talk:Final Approach (visual novel)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Famicom style controller This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article is on a subject of Low priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0.
This article is supported by the Visual novels task force.
A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, which aims to improve and expand anime and manga related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.

Contents

[edit] Demographic

The demographic of this anime/game has been disputed. 19:52, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

  • Would either of the two editors involved in the edit war care to present their reasons for one or the other? Pairadox 02:30, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
This source classifies the anime as Shōjo.--殺人事件 | talk 14:54, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Cleanup may be required

What's with the crossed out statements in the article? Just get rid of them. --HashiriyaGDB 20:57, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Miki Moriya

I think her section houses too much speculation weather she is a bisexual. the events in question supporting her sexuality can also be explain as her being playful and concerned for her friends, like a playful/joker amoung girlfriends (girls being friends).Normally in an anime like this, when someone is a bisexual or homosexual they make it alot more obvious. i plan to leave in the fact that it might be suggested that she is one but also add in the fact that this can also just be considered playful acts amoung friends. Enixspirit (talk) 18:40, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Rizelmine

Someone should work a link to Rizelmine into this article, since it has pretty much the same plot. 128.113.139.187 (talk) 07:29, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

I believe that would qualify as Original Research. Shiroi Hane (talk) 08:55, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Perhaps so, though reviewers do often compare the two. The question is if any of the reviews comparing the two are ones worth citing. And the answer is probably no. 128.113.139.187 (talk) 19:22, 8 April 2008 (UTC)