User talk:F-451
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, F-451, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
- Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
- If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!
[edit] Articles for Deletion: Holophonor and Planet Express Ship
As pointed out by Stardust8212, both the Planet Express Ship and Holophonor articles are currently marked for deletion. Your comments thereon would be really appreciated. DrWho42 06:33, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject:Firearms
I was wondering if you would be interested in joining the Wikiproject Firearms. I know you have experience in the subject matter, and several reference books that would come in handy. We focus on civilian weapons, but work in the areas in military firearms as well.--LWF 03:59, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject Futurama Roll Call
Hello, you are currently listed as a member of Wikiproject Futurama though you may be inactive. This seems to be the case for many members so I am sending this message to help renew interest in working on these articles. If you are still interested in working on Futurama related tasks please visit the wikiproject page to see how you can help. If you have time please also join in the recent discussions on the talk page, in particular I would personally appreciate comments on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Futurama#A new proposal for episode articles. Thank you for your time, hopefully I didn't annoy you too much. If you would not like to receive messages such as this in the future then consider removing yourself from Wikipedia:WikiProject Futurama/List of participants. Happy editing. Stardust8212 01:35, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Firearms
Welcome to the WikiProject Firearms. I hope you enjoy being a member.--LWF 23:57, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Nimbus (Futurama)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Nimbus (Futurama), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Nimbus (Futurama). Judgesurreal777 (talk) 02:41, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Planet Express Ship
Planet Express Ship, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Planet Express Ship satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Planet Express Ship (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Planet Express Ship during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 02:43, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Nimbus (Futurama)
Nimbus (Futurama), an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Nimbus (Futurama) satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nimbus (Futurama) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Nimbus (Futurama) during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 23:31, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] M-1 Carbine Revert War
The M1 carbine article is currently on lock down. An administrator has requested some discussion from memeber of the Firearms Wikiproject. Can you take a look? Sf46 (talk) 19:09, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Robots in Futurama
I have nominated Robots in Futurama, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robots in Futurama. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 03:41, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Filipino Veterans Fairness Act
Regarding your partial reversion of my edits to Filipino Veterans Fairness Act with the edit summary "Fix the format if you wish, but dont change the sources themselves)", when I found a book listed in Google Books with the same ISBN as the pre-change article gave, a book by the same authors and with a slightly-expanded version of the title used in the pre-change version of the article, I presumed that was the same source that the pre-change article was trying to reference. I used the info which Google Books has for the book with that ISBN. See this. I'll remove this article from my watchlist. -- Boracay Bill (talk) 05:37, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Oops
Regarding this, oops indeed. Fortunately, sharp-eyed user:SlimVirgin appears to have fixed this here. Thanks for pointing this out. I will try to be more careful in future. -- Boracay Bill (talk) 11:43, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Welcome
Welcome F-451
Thank you for joining the Law Enforcement Wikiproject on the English Wikipedia! As you would have guessed we are a group dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to law enforcement
Since you now are a member you get to have our userbox or banner on your userpage! To add these use:
- {{User WikiprojectPolice}} -- our userbox, or
- {{lawenforcementmember}} -- our member banner.
Here are some more tips to get you started:
- Creating articles: See here for articles you can create, but don't forget to add [[Category:Law enforcement]] to the base of the article and our project banner to the talk page of the article using {{WPLE}}
- Participate on our talk page: It is highly recommended that you watchlist it. There are also a number of small projects on the talk page as well that may be of interest to you!
- Check the bulletin board: For news and information, please read the bulletin board regularly or add it to you user-page using: {{lawenforcementbulletinboard}}
- Improve an article: Click here to find all the really short articles, pick one from that list and improve it. When you are done go to the talk page of that article and removed {{WPLE| class=Stub}} the bit in bold and another editor will be along to see how well you have done and reassess the article to a much higher class.
All members are reminded:
- That this project aims for: No vandalism, no conflict and if particular articles in this project are suffering from vandalism, edit wars or talk-page abuse, please add it to the Article Watch List
In a nutshell:
- SGGH speak! (Project Coordinator)
- Dep. Garcia ( Talk + | Help Desk | Complaints ) (Assistant Coordinator)
- Or any project coordinator listed on the main project page or members page.
Again, Thank you and Welcome, Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs)☺ 10:28, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
And again, Welcome! Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs)☺ 10:28, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Door breaching
I've attempted to remove the "how-to" tone of the ballistic breaching section, while still adequately documenting the process. Let me know what you think. scot (talk) 15:17, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Law Enforcement Barnstar Proposal Poll
Hello there F-451,
We here at Wikiproject Law Enforcement are currently in the process of deciding wither or not to make this WikiProject Law Enforcement's official Barnstar award. Being that you are a member of Wikiproject Law Enforcement, we are humbly asking you to voice your opinion here about our new Barnstar.
Thank You and All the Best, Mifter (talk) 21:02, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
--Mifter (talk) 21:02, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] HAGGER
Re: [1]
It would take billions of pages. We do the best we can with Mediawiki:Titleblacklist. --Random832 (contribs) 03:32, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Barnstar
| The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
| For being quick to revert vandalism on several articles. Cheers! Eustress (talk) 03:18, 4 May 2008 (UTC) |
[edit] ???
Admin or wannabe admin? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ghost109 (talk • contribs) 16:01, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Welcome!
Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.
A few features that you might find helpful:
- Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
- The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including {{WPMILHIST Announcements}} there.
- Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
- The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, article logistics, and other tasks.
- We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
- We've developed a style guide that covers article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
- If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention.
- The project has a stress hotline available for your use.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Kirill (prof) 00:21, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Cluster bombs
The RRAB-3 does appear to have a third arm, which would validate your assertion that its resemblance to the erect penis is coincidental to the picture. I will refrain from editing that cluster bomb article in such a way any further. 216.26.210.48 (talk) 03:24, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVII (May 2008)
The May 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:36, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Timothy McVeigh
Hey, I thought that the bomb in Oklahoma City killed 168 people, not 165. It even says so on the Oklahoma City bombing page...
- My mistake, edit was correct, but in my defence the editor was a known vandal, though I should havechecked more carefully.


