Talk:Egyptian Theatre (DeKalb, Illinois)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:
Did You Know An entry from Egyptian Theatre (DeKalb, Illinois) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on January 11, 2006.
Wikipedia
Good article Egyptian Theatre (DeKalb, Illinois) has been listed as one of the Arts good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
July 11, 2007 [[Egyptian Theatre (DeKalb, Illinois)|Good article nominee]] Listed

[edit] Six?

The theater is one of only six what remaining in the US? Theaters? Egyptian Theaters? --Dmz5*Edits**Talk* 05:13, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Thought it was obvious because of the previous sentence and the context, but I added the word Egyptian anyway. I mean six theatres in the US, come on now. Happy Editing.A mcmurray 02:59, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Haha I know it didn't mean there are only 6 theatres, but that is exactly what it appeared to mean. It could also have been referring to an intervening sentence that had since been cut out (like, about it having a unique organ or something.)--Dmz5*Edits**Talk* 17:24, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Egyptian Theatre, Coos Bay, Oregon, 1925. Is the 7th. should it read "...it is believed to be only one of a few remaining in the United States"?12.145.73.51 18:59, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
I like that wording much better.A mcmurray 19:22, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tone

Where are the problems, as I will happily fix them.A mcmurray 03:49, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Anyone? Bueller? What are the tone problems? This article didn't seem that informal to me. Anyone?A mcmurray 16:56, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
I agree, there doesn't really seem to be a big tone problem, I removed the tag.-Dmz5*Edits**Talk* 05:01, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GA Pass

I'm passing the article after editing the flow a little in the lead paragraph. It seems to me to have all the essentials - good citing, reasonable coverage, decent grammar and structure, stability, and NPOV. The pictures are also quite nice. Ideas for improvement would be (perhaps) doing something about the architect's red-link or finding something else notable for a new section. --Meowist 06:55, 11 July 2007 (UTC)