Talk:Ecosophy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale. |
 |
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve ecology-related articles. |
|
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale. | |
[edit] Indigenous Ecology
This section lacks any references and simply appears to be the authors own blinkered perspective. Consequently I have deleted it
User:SyTaffel 28 nov 2007
[edit] Social Ecology
Social Ecology does not have a biocentrist perspective. Quite the opposite... or more balanced. Murray Bookchin, the founder of SE, is a harsh and outspoken critic of all the 'sophies' mentioned here, and especially Arne Næss' deep ecology. I have removed it from the list! --PeterKristo 21:35, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Quantum Ecosophy?
A google search for "quantum ecosophy" brings up nothing but this article and a myspace page of a crackpot. Has there been anything written anywhere on quantum ecosophy? Eok20 06:03, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- An "ecosophy formulated from quantum mechanics" is. . . how do I phrase this nicely. . . complete nonsense. Seriously. Note that the article "quantum ecosophy" was speedily deleted as patent nonsense last November. Anville 13:44, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
