User talk:Divide

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Divide, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -- Longhair | Talk 06:53, 8 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits made during January 13, 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 14:47, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Ah, sorry that was misdated. The edit in question was made on 21:03, 13 January 2007 (UTC) and I reverted as good faith as per policy concerns here, with the summary "Reverted good faith edits by Divide per policy concerns. Please read up on policies and guidelines. Thanks! (TW)". You are a (relatively) new user, you didn't provide an edit summary, and I believed the removal of the table wasn't really a good idea. If you want to tell me why you removed it, or you can replace it with a standard infobox, I'll revert my revert. Thanks. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 11:15, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
You know, I suppose you're right. I just reviewed my action and have reverted back to your revision. It'll all be replaced in the next update from meta anyway. Have a nice day. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 15:54, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Raison d'Etre

Hi, regarding your question on my talk page, I commented out the "Raison d'État" section because it appeared we didn't have any articles on that, and because the section was lengthy and off topic from the disambiguation title. Disambiguation pages are really merely only supposed to be a list of links to articles we have, or articles we are likely to have, they're not sources of information for everything there is to say relating to the title of the disambiguation page. However, in checking around now, I see that Raison d'état is a redirect to National interest. I think it would be reasonable to have that redirect in a See also section on the disambiguation page, so I'll add it now. --Xyzzyplugh (talk) 02:39, 5 May 2008 (UTC)