Talk:Direction finding

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

AVIATION This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

I plan to add more information on single channel direction finding in the coming months when I get some nice graphics that aren't copyrighted. I will also add some mathematical background & equations as soon as I am confident I can get them to show up nicely (I'm fairly new to this). If there are any issues with what I have added, feel free to remove them but please tell me why. --Negative3 05:58, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I agree that this article should be merged with Radio Direction Finding. RDF should be the proper name of the article. Jakro64 07:06, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Information on sources of error in RDF, common patterns of error, and degree of/type of error associated with particular situations would be a useful addition to this page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.132.190.26 (talk) 16:27, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

I added a reference (Appleyard 1988) with information about marine DF accuracy. I also believe that this article and Radio Direction Finding should be merged.sv1xv 2008-01-06.



Today all such systems are being generally removed in favour of the GPS system: I added a request for citations, as NDBs are gradually replaced with VORs, not with the GPS system. Sv1xv (talk) 04:32, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

I removed this phrase:

Today all such systems are being generally removed in favour of the GPS system. 

and copied it here, as there is no reference or evidence supporting it.

[edit] Aviation Portal assessment

There are four related articles on the subject:

I propose that further content development and improvement about NDBs goes in the fist article and the other three give a brief description and refer the reader to the first one.

Sv1xv (talk) 07:21, 15 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] External links & Further reading

I removed the following two external links for the reasons stated:

I also removed the following link, as it is not directly relevant:

The folloing link is also part of a commercial site, but contains 13 articles with a lot of useful information and references, so I decided to keep it in the article:

Sv1xv (talk) 15:45, 13 February 2008 (UTC)