Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2008 April 14
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] 14 April 2008
|
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
|
Was either the deleting admin or the person who moved this to Commons even literate? Did they even look at the talk page? This file is not legal for Commons but is here. -Nard 00:40, 15 April 2008 (UTC) |
| The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
|
Its an NYSE traded company that should have an article, if the content was poor, that could have been fixed as a surmountable problem--Tbmorgan74 (talk) 20:58, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
|
| The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
|
An article about a Cypriot politician, candidate for the Cypriot Presintentship. It was in Wikipedia for some time and at least 2 editors have contributed for it. I think the person is more important than many footballers, but the article was not very good. Article deleted by User:Seicer with A7. I requested undeletion so an Afd to be made and see if the article can be improved. Seicer agreed with me but within 20 minutes, User:Cobaltbluetony deleted again and refused to undelete it. Check the deletion log as well. I request once more undeletion so the article has the chance to go though an AfD. Note, that the creator who is not me, wasn't never warned for that and that the article was link in four different articles in Wikipedia and none went to fix the red links at least. -- Magioladitis (talk) 18:44, 14 April 2008 (UTC) Magioladitis (talk) 18:44, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
|
| The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
|
This article was deleted a couple months ago and is a protected redirect. The article was deleted mainly because of the lack of evidence of notability and the fact it hadn't been released yet. However, Outcast will be released in only eight days, and new information has surfaced that, I think, establish notability. What the article would look like can be seen here. Obviously, some sections can't be filled in until the release, but I'll complete them when the information becomes available. Thanks, Shrewpelt (talk) 01:17, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
|
| The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |

