User talk:Dandelion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive
Archives
  1. 4 Jan 2006 – 7 April 2006

Contents

[edit] Image for deletion

[edit] Image:NRT6_2001.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:NRT6_2001.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Flyguy649talkcontribs 03:58, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] It's happening again!!! Nominated for deletion: Image:NRT6 2001.jpg

[edit] Image:Name.ext listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Name.ext, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Hornetman16 05:01, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:GrowUpWithoutShame.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:GrowUpWithoutShame.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 16:56, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hello

I recommend you head over to Commons and comment there as well [1]. -N 01:14, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for your kind welcome, Dandelion1.

Thanks for your kind welcome. You make some suggestions which are very vague. Want to be more specific? The only specific criticism was that the word clothist is not widely used. Well, I think it's as widely used as many of the others. Besides, we can include rare words, can't we? I'm not sure I'm typing this in the right place. It really should be available for the other contributors to read, shouldn't it? Korky Day Korky Day 08:32, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Please do not move pages by cut and paste

but use the "move" function so as not to destroy the Wikipedia:Page history. I will delete Social nudity now and restore the previous version at Naturism because it appears to be simply copied content. To rename a page like this, I would also advise you should first go seek consensus at Wikipedia:Requested moves. Kusma (討論) 00:38, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

The use of the "move" function (see Help:Move) would also automatically move the talk page and leave appropriate redirects in place. Cut and paste is very confusing. Kusma (討論) 00:43, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] redirect

Strange; you know about redirects enough to redirect your talk page, so why did you do the absolute no-no of copy-and-pasting naturism to social nudity.? -- RHaworth 00:46, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Social Nudity

Please examine recent user contributions by User:Cyndiann. She removed all content from Clothes free movement and Clothes free people and redirected it to article titles with the NPOV term naturism in the title in them, then rewrote the articles using NPOV naturism. Can you please help me get an admin involved this dispute? I'm sorry if I made errors. Where is the best place to discuss this? I'm concerned that any article that is in the middle of an edit/revert/move war could lose the dialogue. Please Please help!!!! Thanks. Dandelion1 01:05, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your help! What can I do about the two other articles? I have requested both of them to be moved back. Thanks! Dandelion1 01:45, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
About the title of Naturism versus Social nudity, I don't want to take a side in this dispute. (Actually, I don't want to take sides in this dispute at all, just trying to repair your cut&paste moves). Wider discussion on that one is maybe not a bad idea. I don't quite understand what the POV involved here is: is it a "naturist" versus "nudist" thing? I'm sorry, I am used to easier questions like whether to use the German or Polish name of some obscure villages in Poland ;-) Kusma (討論) 01:48, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
Oh, and the history of Clothes free people was deleted, so if you feel WP:BOLD and are sure that's the right title, you can move the article back there yourself. Kusma (討論) 01:51, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
Thank you! Yes, I am very WP:BOLD. Cheers! Thank you so much for your help and patience with people like me!! Re: POV dispute, yes people can create an article on either naturism and nudism and they would be virtually identicle, so it is better to use a more broad term, see the dicussion page on what was Social nudity. My associate, who is the editor at large for Nude and Natural magazine has spent over a year working on an article showing how each country has a different interpretation and usage of those two words. Germany even adds FKK to add to the confusion more. Cheers! Dandelion1 02:06, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
Do you know how I change my signature to automatically be Dandelion instead of Dandelion1 when I sign? Thanks! Dandelion1 02:53, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
Go to Special:Preferences, check "Raw link" and enter
[[User:Dandelion|Dandelion]]
in the "Nickname" field. Maybe even better would be a signature including talk and contributions links:
[[User:Dandelion]] ([[User talk:Dandelion|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Dandelion1|contribs]])
because your method of redirecting your use page hides your contributions a bit. Hope that helps, Kusma (討論) 03:02, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
Yeehaw!!! Thank you so much! You are so awesome! Cheers! User:Dandelion (talk|contribs) 03:44, 13 April 2006 (UTC) (testing signature)


[edit] Image:PaintedCyclists2005_1.jpg

Based on your other uploads it does not appear that you are the copyright holder of this image. How do we know that "The copyright holder allows anyone to use it for any purpose, provided that copyright holder is attributed."? Have you communicated with the copyright holder? --Gmaxwell 17:57, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 3RR-warning

I would be carefull to revert to Social nudity again because of violating WP:3RR.KimvdLinde 04:05, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your thoughtful note. So how many reverts do you have left today? User:Dandelion (talk|contribs) 04:08, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Locked out of the wiki

Daniel -

Michael Nedell here - one of the organizers for WNBR Burlington Vermont 06. I am locked out of the wiki, and wanted to put the times and location and such stuff up there. The reason given is, vandalism on photo or something like that. Please help!

My IP address is 69.171.204.199. Please include this address in any queries you make.

Our ride is going to be big this year! I started a myspace for it and have gotten some support from the biking community early, so the word is gettng out there already...

Take care and thanks-

MIchael

[edit] Some advise

I am going to give you some well meant advise (although you might experience this differently). The advise is to leave the Nudism Naturalism etc pages alone for a few days and cool down. There is to much venom in you writing at the moment resulting in personal attacks, and that is not going to work to get a consensus. KimvdLinde 02:25, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

Drink more juice. User:Dandelion (talk|contribs) 23:50, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Seattle Weekly and Bike Ride

Hi Daniel,

I hope I have your correct email address. I work with Seattle Weekly in the advertising department. I would like to talk to you when you have a moment this week about placing in ad in our paper for the World Naked Bike Ride 2006. Our weekly circulation is 100,000 + and we distribute as far north as Everett and south as Olympia + on the Eastside. My contact information is listed below. Thanks and I look forward to talking to you!

Best,

Ashley Roessner Seattle Weekly Account Executive 206-467-4398 aroessner@seattleweekly.com

[edit] Primal Scream

I had nothing to do with organizing it, I just watched it. Good luck! Briancua 02:26, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Help?

Will you consider commenting on some AfD nominations and merge-delete propositions that I believe are an attempt to drive off a good editor? (OK, she's my wife. But she's exhausted by this fight; her articles are written in good faith and this editor is making a mockery of WP.)

Thank you! --JuanFiguroa 03:09, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:VisionsYoga.jpg

I see you have restored Image:VisionsYoga.jpg. This image was previously deleted because the copyright holder demanded others ask for permission to use the image. Has the copyright holder sent a license grant to permissions@wikimedia.org? --Gmaxwell 03:11, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

What does a license grant look like? Thanks. User:Dandelion (talk|contribs) 02:25, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Timeline of non-sexual public nudity

The article was nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of significant non-sexualized public nudity activities and moved to the current title per the discussion. However, since the article seems to be copied from another source and there's no indication that it's used with permission I blanked it and listed it on Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2006 August 5/Articles. If you hold the copyright to it, or you have permission to use it under the terms of GFDL, please indicate so on the article's talk page and under the article's listing on the aforementioned copyright problems page. Thanks. - Bobet 13:41, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for clearing that up, the page is back to normal now. - Bobet 07:33, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Please help

Sorry to bother you, but as an Inclusionist wikipedia things are getting desperate and I need to appeal to your for help. We are facing a situation where a deletionist admin is free to declare inclusionist arguments "absurd" and ignore them at will. If you don't agree with this situation, please share your opinion here. Kappa 02:12, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nudity in combat

Dandelion, I was reviewing articles on combat and came across the Nudity in combat article. To me the topic was nudity in combat. I understand this to be similar to nudity while fighting, which the balance of the article is focused. The topic was not nudity in prison or nudity in humilation and degradation. I deleted the picture of Abu Graihb (sp) and some of the narrative you added recently. Articles need to stay focused on topic and not "bleed" into other topics. Cheers. Storm Rider (talk) 21:36, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:NRT6_2001.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:NRT6_2001.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. -- Hornetman16 18:29, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Once again this image is up for deletion by yours truly.-- Hornetman16 04:28, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Petra+fishermen.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Petra+fishermen.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Abu badali (talk • contribs) 03:25, 14 December 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:CFportal.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:CFportal.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. 68.190.119.253 11:08, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Picture

Thanks for adding the photograph I took of a female model at the World Bodypainting Festival to the body painting article. This is the first time I have seen someone else use images I have created. JIP | Talk 17:44, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Naked yoga photo & Ernesto Bustamante

Daniel,

The photo of the lady doing nude yoga really seems inappropriate as it pertains to yoga. Yes, the pose is a yoga pose, but it's too explicit IMHO (as both a lifelong nudist and a yoga teacher).

Also, I noticed in the history that you added Ernesto Bustamante as a nude yoga teacher in NJ back in December. I can't find any reference to him teaching such classes here.

I've been teaching a nude yoga class for over 3 years here in Morristown, NJ. It started at Sky Farm in Basking Ridge and is now done in my private studio. There is a growing community of people here and I can't find anyone who has heard of Ernesto Bustamante before. Where did that reference come from?

Dan Speers http://www.speers.nu/yoga/

[edit] Cascadia

I've noticed that you have an userbox which points to the Cascadia disambiguation page, instead of pointing to Cascadia (independence movement). You might want to change your userbox. --Pi (π) 10:14, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:HorsesCM.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:HorsesCM.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Atom 02:25, 5 February 2007 (UTC) Sorry. No offense intended. I saw that the copyrighted image has been used as fair-use but was not used within fair use. I always send these for deletion so that they won't be mis-used again. Atom 02:26, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mountain Biking on Mount Tamalpais

Hello, An article that I created as a part of Wikiproject Cycling called Mountain Biking on Mount Tamalpais and linked to the Mount Tamalpais article, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mountain Biking on Mount Tamalpais. Thank you, Bob in Las Vegas -  uriel8  (talk) 10:04, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Clearly nudity is an area of personal interest for you...

...but that doesn't mean that it should be in every single article you can possibly conceive of working it into. If you feel that strongly about including nude images in the Sun Tanning article, then maybe you should check out the Talk page and speak to the numerous issues raised regarding the image in question (all of which have not been even remotely addressed thus far). I think you're letting your personal interests cloud your judgement, as well as your willingness to enter appropriate discussion of the subject at hand. I'll look forward to hearing from you. Thanks! 70.94.32.98 04:41, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nudity in Judaism article

Please see my comments in Talk:Nudity in Judaism. Thanks, --Shirahadasha 02:56, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Hello, this article has been proposed for deletion in accordiance with Wikipedia's deletion policy As the article's principle author, you're entitled to join this discussion and explain why the article should be kept. Please feel free to join the discussion taking place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nudity in Judaism. Best, --Shirahadasha 01:52, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vincent Bethell

I Vincent Bethell am the ultimate authority on who I am. If people object to my viewpoint as not being neutral I will remove all my details from Wikipedia.

Over the years there have been numerous viewpoints on Vincent from other people but these other people are biased because they are not Vincent. I do not wish to inculde the views that I am a dickhead, shithead, twat, wanker etc, which it seems I would be forced to do if I am to fairly represent all views regarding me.

With a living person's Bio I feel only the living person can truly reprsent who they are.

I refuse to have other people tell me who I am.

I am the only authority upon Vincent Bethell.

I am not biased. I am merely me and if an entry in Wikipedia is to truly reflect me it must then be written by me.

Vincent Bethell

Hi Vincent, sorry if any of my edits are inaccurate or problematic. I'm trying to the best I can to help create a good article on you. Obviously it is important to get the facts right.
Let's work together to make an article that focuses on the facts of your philosophy, influence of your ideas and so forth. Deleting the article really isn't an option at this point for anybody involved in the editing process or outside of it given your noteability and significance, despite any controversies surrounding you or your approaches or whatever.
When making statements about your positions on certain controversies or points we should be careful to cite our references so people can verify that what is said in the article truly represents what you have said and or believe. This can help reduce any malicous or erroneous edits made by others within the article.
If you have a list of press or media coverage it may also be helpful to build a repository off this page. One possible place is Naked Wikia.
Let me know what I can do to help. I do have good intentions and so do most of the people who contribute to building Wikipedia, I hope you believe that.
Cheers,
Daniel —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dandelion1 (talk • contribs) 04:29, 16 April 2007 (UTC).
Is it just me, or is it ironic that someone who does things like this and this is trying to be taken seriously? xC | ☎ 12:55, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Vincent has done things which may not be conventionally accepted, but it is important I think to have a neutral article detailing his significance, philosophy, activities and influence. This is going to be a challenge. User:Dandelion (talk|contribs) 01:43, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WP:COIN posting

Hi - since you created the articles mentioned, I wanted to call your attention to this post on the conflict of interest noticeboard. In light of the above message (which I just noticed) your comments would definitely be welcome. Cheers - RJASE1 Talk 02:56, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Outside Magazine and World Naked Bike Ride

Hi-

I work for Outside magazine and we'd like to list the Seattle World Nake Bike Ride in our magazine. But I need to confirm the date of the event. Please email or call me as soon as possible. I'm on deadline. Thank you!

Megan Michelson Outside Magazine mmichelson@outsidemag.com 505-989-7100, ext 124 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.204.151.122 (talk) 15:49, 3 May 2007 (UTC).


Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:0128George.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[2][3]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. —Remember the dot (talk) 02:30, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] re Nudity and children

You're right, I should not have deleted this article. It is now restored. Herostratus 05:36, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Autobiography

You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved, as you did at Daniel Lorenz Johnson. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. --GentlemanGhost 15:44, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:NRT6 2001.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:NRT6 2001.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Breaks Florida Law

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Hornetman16 03:41, 23 June 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Image:NRT6_2001.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:NRT6_2001.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Flyguy649talkcontribs 03:58, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

  • I moved the image to Commons, I suggest you comment over there too [4]. -N 01:11, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:CFportal.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:CFportal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. MaxSem 10:37, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:NRT6 2001.jpg

I'd just like to reply too one thing you said on the dicussion page for deletion. You said "The law is different in different parts of the world and these issues are being played out in different events." WAKE UP!!!!! It's true the laws are different all over the globe but the servers for this dite are in Florida and according to Wikipedia is not censored, it says we follow FLORIDA LAW witch that photo does not. I guarentee you with 2 months that photo will be deleted an protected from being created agian withou being nominated. Have a Jesus filled day!!!-- Hornetman16 05:17, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Hornetdude, the image is within the law and is an asset to Wikipedia. I'm sorry things are not going well for you in the debate. Better luck next time. I am a Christian as you are so don't try to play that game with me. User:Dandelion (talk|contribs) 00:26, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Not according to the Police and Media I've contacted but, you go ahead and live in your fantasy world, I WILL GET THAT PHOTO DELETED!!!And by the way, if you were a Christian you'd know God would frown on that photo! He's the one that told me to fight so hard to get it deleted. Thank You!-- Hornetman16 04:53, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Sounds like a crusade. Glad your life now has a clear purpose. Make sure you mention that Jesus told you to delete the image on the debate page. User:Dandelion (talk|contribs) 05:15, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Most of these people son't believe in Jesus so it wouldn't matter, PLUS, it was God that told me not Jesus.-- Hornetman16 05:17, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] What to do about the deleted article on Vincent Bethell

Hello Dandelion1. I believe you are the creator of the article on Bethell. There is a discussion about it at WP:AN#Vincent Bethell. Please see the discussion at User_talk:Kernel Saunters#Vincent Bethell and let us know what you think should be done. Kernel Saunters is suggesting a protected redirect from Vincent Bethell to The Freedom to be Yourself. Please reply here. EdJohnston 18:39, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Vincent is one of the most significant figures in for public nudity/social nudity in the world. The redirect is inappropriate. It is important to establish a NPOV comprehensive page on this person. His numerous rewrites have not been appreciated and I'm getting very frustrated trying to edit the article when things like this happen. Thank you. User:Dandelion (talk|contribs) 23:41, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] why is the naked yoga picture. . .

so bushy, I mean its probably covered with a strange scent. Can you change the picture. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by HanoverNewH (talk • contribs) 21:07, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Public nudity

I disagree with some of your changes and will revert the image removals tomorrow. The way to work on Wikipedia is to build consensus when someone takes an issue with changes to long-standing article format, not just edit war with the person. Your etiquette in this regard is poor. See you on the article tomorrow. --David Shankbone 23:14, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Request for mediation on Sun tanning

  • Dandelion, please go to WP:Requests for mediation/Sun tanning, in particular the Parties' agreement to mediate section and enter an agree or disagree on the subject of mediation. I would hope you would agree, in good faith, to get the opinions of those not involved in the article. Pharmboy (talk) 01:35, 5 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Request for mediation accepted

A Request for Mediation to which you were are a party has been accepted.
You can find more information on the case subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Sun tanning.
For the Mediation Committee, WjBscribe 05:30, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management.
If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

[edit] Sun tanning Mediation

Hello Dandelion, I have accepted the request for mediation for the article on Sun tanning; I invite you to make a statement about the dispute here. Thank you. Keilana|Parlez ici 19:06, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Sun tanning

Good evening, Dandelion. Keilana, a respected Administrator, has offered to take the Sun tanning Mediation as a non-Committee member. However, such an offer requires the consent of all parties, in addition to their initial consent to the Mediation itself. As such, I invite you to review the Committee's statement here, and respond accordingly. Please don't hesitate to get in touch if you have any queries. Regards, AGK (talk) 23:05, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you very much for accepting my offer. Would you please state your view of the dispute on the Mediation talk page? I think it would be useful for everybody (me included) to get a clear picture of what's going on from your point of view. Thanks. Keilana|Parlez ici 17:19, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks, I need some time. After Sunday? User:Dandelion (talk|contribs) 05:55, 14 February 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dandelion1 (talk • contribs)
That's alright, no problem. Keilana|Parlez ici 17:36, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks very much for commenting. I've suggested a way to move forward on the mediation talk page, would you like to comment? Further discussion will take place there, if you don't mind. (If you do mind, we can move it to a subpage or something, but as I'm not a Committee member it may be a better idea to leave it on the mediation talk.) Keilana|Parlez ici 04:27, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Considering that the issue that caused the mediation has been resolved, would you be happy with closing it? I think that it's been sorted out, and that it can be successfully closed. Thanks, Keilana|Parlez ici 22:27, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Study at UW

Hi! I'm part of a group at UW in Computer Science trying to make editing in Wikipedia easier. I'd love to talk to you and other Wikipedians in the Seattle area about your practices. You can find my webpage at [5] and email me from there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kayur (talk • contribs) 21:59, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] nice picture

I need more nude pictures can u help me mail me —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.88.65.63 (talk) 19:17, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:NN25.1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:NN25.1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:30, 2 June 2008 (UTC)