Talk:Daemon (Warhammer)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Daemon army
Does any one out there have suggestions about starting a 500pts mostly daemon army of slaanesh Kevin f 21:50, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for your interest in Wikipedia. However, this "talk" page is for discussing changes to the Wikipedia article itself, rather than anything directly to do with playing the game. You'll probably get a lot more responses if you try on (for example) one of the forums listed on the main Warhammer 40,000 page. Cheers --Pak21 10:30, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
Hey guys, just wanted to say that you did a good job on this page. I really like it. :) Fr0 05:36, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Parallel Universe?
Would describe a universe that mirrored the WH40K universe but was discrete from it... does any source material describe the Warp as such? It's really more analogous to a different level of existence in the same universe.
[edit] Oblits/Iron Warriors
Since with the 4th Edition Codex, Oblits are not 0-1 for any flavor of CSM should this bit be dropped? Currently no legion of Chaos Space Marines have special rules. --BenWoodruff 19:19, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Chaos spawn
Just read the section on spawns and princes. I'm not to sure about the section on spawns being created. I was always under the impression they were made if the gods became unhappy with their champions, or the previously mentioned random mutation. I dont think i've ever read them being made by an excess of demonic gifts. I know that can happen in the sub game (for lack of a better word) "path to glory" and its 40k equivelent, but that clearly distinguishes between gifts and mutations, although those mutations are still often wanted. Drasern 09:06, 12 October 2007 (UTC) Kind of more relates to the excesses of Daemon "gifts" from the old Realms of Chaos books. Still would say its relevant. Remember the flatulence? *shudders* still trying to forget it heh. ChonkE (talk) 10:24, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Bloodraven.jpg
Image:Bloodraven.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 10:21, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

