Talk:Curragh
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was move. —Nightstallion (?) 11:19, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Moving to Curragh
cf. Sahara, Himalaya. Pissant 15:02, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- I can see an argument, but I'm not convinced because the "the" is part of the name, as it would not be in, say, "the Glen of Aherlow". The examples are more like the latter (the Sahara Desert, the Himalaya mountains) but "The Curragh" is a name-in-itself. See The Fens. BrendanH 15:42, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- Support. PeaceOnEarth 01:49, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit] Result?
I'm a bit surprised at Nightstallion's interpretation of the discussion. A proposal, an argument against, a single (unargued) vote for, becomes an unambiguous "move"? BrendanH 11:28, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

