Criticism of the Bible

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article or section may be inaccurate or unbalanced in favor of certain viewpoints. Please improve the article by adding information on neglected viewpoints, or discuss the issue on the talk page.

This article or section is in need of attention from an expert on the subject. WikiProject Christianity or the Christianity Portal may be able to help recruit one. If a more appropriate WikiProject or portal exists, please adjust this template accordingly.(April 2008)

This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding reliable references. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (May 2007)

This article or section may contain original research or unverified claims. Please improve the article by adding references. See the talk page for details. (September 2007)

Part of a series on The Bible
Biblical canon and books
Tanakh: Torah · Nevi'im · Ketuvim Old Testament · Hebrew Bible · New Testament · New Covenant · Deuterocanon · Antilegomena · Chapters & verses Apocrypha: Jewish · OT · NT
Development and authorship
Panbabylonism · Jewish Canon · Old Testament canon · New Testament canon · Mosaic authorship · Pauline epistles · Johannine works
Translations and manuscripts
Septuagint · Samaritan Pentateuch · Dead Sea scrolls · Targums · Peshitta · Vetus Latina · Vulgate · Masoretic text · Gothic Bible · Luther Bible · English Bibles
Biblical studies
Dating the Bible · Biblical criticism · Higher criticism · Textual criticism · Novum Testamentum Graece · NT textual categories · Documentary hypothesis · Synoptic problem · The Bible and history‎ · Biblical archaeology
Interpretation
Hermeneutics · Pesher · Midrash · Pardes · Allegorical · Literalism · Prophecy
Views
Inerrancy · Infallibility · Criticism · Islamic · Qur'anic · Gnostic · Judaism and Christianity · Law in Christianity
This box: view • talk • edit

This article is about criticisms which are made against the Bible as a source of information or ethical guidance. This is not the same thing as Biblical Criticism, which is the academic treatment of the Bible as a historical document. It is also not the same as Criticism of Christianity, which is the criticism of the Christian religion as a whole.

In modern times, the view that the Bible should be accepted as historically accurate and as a reliable guide to morality has been questioned by many mainstream academics in the field of Biblical Criticism, such as Israel Finkelstein and Richard Elliott Friedman. While the idea of Biblical inerrancy has consequently been discarded by some Christian and Jewish groups, or at least modified in such a way as to allow certain portions of the Bible to be reinterpreted, the modern movement of Christian Fundamentalism as well as much of Orthodox Judaism, strongly support the idea that people view the Bible as a historically accurate and a fundamental source of moral guidance.

In addition to concerns about morality, inerrancy, or historicity, there is the question of which books should be included in the Bible. Jews discount the New Testament, all but Coptic Christianity discounts the Books of Enoch and of Jubilees, and most religions discount the remainder of the New Testament apocrypha.

Contents 1 Translation issues 2 Ethics in the Bible 3 Internal consistency 4 Deliberate falsifications 5 The Bible and history 6 Bible Prophecies 6.1 Unfulfilled prophecies 7 The Bible and science 8 See also 9 References 10 External links

[edit] Translation issues

Main article: Almah Controversy

See also: Criticism_of_Christianity#Mistranslation_and_textual_corruption

Translation has given rise to a number of issues, as the original languages are often quite different in grammar as well as word meaning. While the Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy states that inerrancy applies only to the original languages, some believers trust their own translation to be the accurate one. One such group of believers is known as the King-James-Only Movement. For readability, clarity, or other reasons, translators may choose different wording or sentence structure, and some translations may choose to paraphrase passages. Because some of the words in the original language have ambiguous or difficult to translate meanings, debates over the correct interpretation occur.

For instance, the word used in the masoretic text at Isaiah 7:14 to indicate the woman who would bear Emmanuel is alleged to mean a young, unmarried woman in Hebrew, while Matthew 1:23 follows the Septuagint version of the passage which uses the Greek word parthenos, translated virgin, and is used to support the Christian idea of virgin birth. Those who view the masoretic text, which forms the basis of most English translations of the Old Testament, as being more accurate than the Septuagint, and trust its usual translation, may see this as an inconsistency, whereas those who take the Septuagint to be accurate may not.

In the History of the English Bible, there have been many changes to the wording, leading to several competing versions. Many of these have contained Biblical errata - typographic errors, such as the phrases Is there no treacle in Gilead?, Printers have persecuted me without cause, and Know ye not that the unrighteous shall inherit the kingdom of God?, and even Thou shalt commit adultery.

More recently, several discoveries of ancient manuscripts such as the Dead Sea scrolls, and Codex Sinaiticus, have led to modern translations differing somewhat from the older ones, removing verses not present in the earliest manuscripts, some of which are acknowledged as frauds, such as the Comma Johanneum, others having several highly variant versions in very important places, such as the resurrection scene in Mark 16, and others still having a large degree of doubt under textual criticism such as John 21. The King-James-Only Movement advocates reject these changes and uphold the King James Version as the most accurate.^[1]

[edit] Ethics in the Bible

Main article: Ethics in the Bible

Certain interpretations of the moral decisions in the Bible are considered ethically questionable by many modern groups. Some of the passages most commonly criticized include the subjugation of women, religious intolerance, sexual acts like incest although it was told to be wrong after the events of Noah's flood ^[2], condemnation of homosexuality, support for the institution of slavery in both Old and New Testaments, obligatory religious wars and the order to commit the genocide of the Canaanites and the Amalekites. While some religious groups support the Bible's decisions by reminding critics that they should be judged by the standards of the time, to which they measure much more closely, other religious groups, mostly conservatives and particularly Southern Baptists, see nothing wrong with the Bible's judgements.^[3] Other critics of the Bible, such as Friedrich Nietzsche, have criticized the morality of the New Testament, regarding it as weak and conformist-oriented.

[edit] Internal consistency

Main article: Internal consistency and the Bible

This section does not cite any references or sources. (April 2008) Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unverifiable material may be challenged and removed.

There are many places in the Bible in which inconsistencies have been alleged by critics, presenting as difficulties the different numbers and names for the same feature, and different sequences for what is supposed to be the same event. Responses to these criticisms include the modern documentary hypothesis, two source hypothesis (in various guises), and allegations that the Pastoral Epistles are pseudonymous. Contrasting with these critical stances are positions supported by literalists, considering the texts to be consistent, with the Torah written by a single source, but the Gospels by four independent witnesses, and all of the Pauline Epistles, except maybe Hebrews, written by Paul.

[edit] Deliberate falsifications

Notable among those who concluded that the Bible contained deliberate falsehoods was Thomas Jefferson. He considered much of the New Testament of the Bible to be lies. He edited his own version of the bible and omitted what he considered to be these falsehoods. He described these as "so much untruth, charlatanism and imposture". He described the "roguery of others of His disciples", and called them a "band of dupes and impostors", and described Paul as the "first corruptor of the doctrines of Jesus", and wrote of "palpable interpolations and falsifications". He also described the Book of Revelation to be "merely the ravings of a maniac, no more worthy nor capable of explanation than the incoherences of our own nightly dreams". ^[4]

[edit] The Bible and history

Main article: The Bible and history

The Hebrew bible (Christian Old Testament) contains texts in many different genres, including what appears on the surface to be a history of mankind, focusing on the Israelites and eventually on the people of Judah, from the creation of the world to the return of the Jewish exiles to Jerusalem in the fifth century BC. This history is divided into three parts: the Torah, dealing with the period from the Creation to the death of Moses; the Deuteronomistic history (the books of Joshua, Judges, Samuel and Kings), dealing with the conquest of Canaan and the later history of the kings of Israel and Judah down to the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem in 586 BC; and the Chronicler's History, consisting of the books of Nehemiah and Ezra and dealing with the return to Jeruslaem of the Jewish exiles.

While some biblical scholars postulate that the five books of the Torah do not describe real history, there is debate over just when and why they were composed.^{[citation needed]} The dominant explanation in the first half of the 20th century was that they were originally four texts, each telling a complete but slightly different story from Creation to the death of Moses, composed at various times between c.950 BC and 550BC and combined into their present form around 450BC.^{[citation needed]} This theory - the Documentary Hypothesis - is not longer so widely held, and has been challenged by other theories which would place the composition of the Torah later (in the post-586BC period), and see many more sources behind it.^{[citation needed]}

The Deuteronomistic History and the Choniclers History are also considered of dubious historical value. The Deuteronomistic History was composed around 600BC from previously-existing records, and that while it may be accurate for events around that time and a little later, its account of earlier history is largely legendary. The Chroniclers History was composed somewhat later, following the return from the Exile in Babylon. There is a growing realisation that these histories were never intended to be an accurate and dispassionate account of evenys, but reflected the political and theological aims of their authors.

In the 2nd century, the gnostics often asserted that their form of Christianity was the first, in which Jesus was sometimes regarded as merely a teaching device, or as a docetic teacher, or allegory.^[5] Several examples of gnostic attitudes and religion are proposed to exist in the Pauline Epistles, even by well respected and mainstream scholars such as Elaine Pagels. Bart D. Ehrman and Raymond E. Brown note that some of the Pauline epistles are widely regarded by scholars as pseudonymous,^[6] and it is the view of Timothy Freke, and others, that this involved a forgery in an attempt by the Church to bring in Paul's gnostic supporters, and turn the arguments in the other Epistles on their head.

Some critics have maintained that Christianity isn't founded on an historical figure, but rather on a mythical creation.^[7] This view proposes that the idea of Jesus was the Jewish manifestation of a pan-Hellenic cult, known as Osiris-Dionysus^[8], which acknowledged the non-historic nature of the figure, using it instead as a teaching device.

[edit] Bible Prophecies

The fulfillment of Bible prophecies is a popular argument used by Christian apologists to prove the divine inspiration of the Bible. In prophecy fulfillment, they see evidence of God's direct involvement in the writing of the Bible. However, critics argue that bible prophecies turn out to be prophecies only because Bible writers arbitrarily declared them to be prophecies or the fulfillments became fulfillments only because biased New Testament writers arbitrarily declared them to be fulfillments^[9].

One example is found Matthew 1:23 where it was claimed that an angel's announcement to Joseph that his betrothed wife Mary would give birth to a child conceived by the Holy Spirit was done to fulfill a prophecy spoken by Isaiah: "Behold, the virgin shall be with child, and bear a Son, and they shall call his name Immanuel." In the original context, however, Isaiah made this statement as a sign to Ahaz, king of Judah, that an alliance recently formed against him by Rezin, the king of Syria, and Pekah, the king of Israel, would not succeed in defeating him. The Lord had sent Isaiah to reassure Ahaz that the alliance would not prevail. Isaiah begged Ahaz to ask for a sign that his prophecy was true. Finally, Isaiah said to him, "Hear now, O house of David! Is it a small thing for you to weary men, but will you weary my God also? Therefore Yahweh Himself will give you a sign: Behold, the young woman shall conceive, and bear a Son, and shall call his name Immanuel"(Isaiah 7:13-14). Jewish scholars argue that the prophecy was made not to foretell the birth of Jesus some 700 years later but the birth of a child to that time^[10] and also point out, in Isaiah 7:14 that the word Almah is part of the Hebrew phrase ha-almah hara, meaning “the almah is pregnant.” Since the present tense is used, it is clear that the young woman was already pregnant and hence not a virgin. This being the case, the verse cannot be cited as a prediction of the future.^[11][12]

Critics also claim that many biblical prophecies were in fact written after the events supposedly predicted or that their text were modified after the event to fit the facts as they occurred. One of the most famous examples of an alleged after-the-fact prophecy is the Little Apocalypse recorded in the Olivet Discourse of the Gospel of Mark. It predicts the siege of Jerusalem and destruction of the Jewish Temple at the hands of the Romans in 70 AD. Most mainstream New Testament scholars concede this is an ex eventu, as are many of the prophecies in the Old Testament(e.g. Daniel 11).^{[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]}

[edit] Unfulfilled prophecies

The neutrality and factual accuracy of this section are disputed. Please see the relevant discussion on the talk page. (May 2008)

Further information: Bible prophecy

The Bible also contains prophecies that are disputed, including

• Joshua said that God would, without fail, drive out the Jebusites and Canaanites, among others (Joshua 3:9-10). But those tribes were not driven out(Joshua 15:63, 17:12-13).
• Ezekiel said Egypt would be made an uninhabited wasteland for forty years (Ezekiel 29:10-14), and Nebuchadrezzar would plunder it (Ezekiel 29:19-20). Neither happened.^{[citation needed]}

• Ezekiel predicts that the island of Tyre will be utterly destroyed by Nebuchadnezzar and "made a bare rock" which will "never be rebuilt"(Ezekiel 26:1,7-14,32). However, Tyre was eventually destroyed by Alexander the Great. Despite the prophet, the city of Tyre was eventually rebuilt as evidenced by the visits to Tyre by Jesus and Paul (Mt.15:21, Mk.7:24, 31, Acts 21:3) and still exists to this day. (see Tyre, Lebanon)
• Isaiah spoke of a prophecy God made to Ahaz, the King of Judah that he would not be harmed by his enemies(Isaiah 7:1-7), yet according to II Chronicles, Syria and Pekah did conquer Judah(II Chronicles 28:1, 5-6).
• Jeremiah predicts 70 years(Jeremiah 29:10) for the Babylonian exiles but they only lasted 59 years.^{[citation needed]}
• Micah predicts the destruction of Jerusalem(Micah 3:12) (which at the time was about to be invaded by Sennacherib and seemed inevitable) blaming the destruction on the corruption of the priesthood of Judah. A century later Jeremiah quotes Micah and tries to excuse the failed prophecy by saying that "the Lord changed his mind" about that destruction(Jeremiah 26:18-19).^[21].
• In predicting Jerusalem's fall to Babylon, Jeremiah prophesied that Zedekiah, the king of Judah, would "die in peace" (Jer. 34:2-5), however according to Jeremiah 52:9-11, he was put in prison till the day of his death.
• Prophetess Huldah prophesied that Josiah would die in peace(2 Kings 22:18-20), but rather than dying in peace, as the prophetess predicted, Josiah was killed at Megiddo in a battle with Egyptian forces (2 Chron. 35:20-24). ^[9]
• Amos 7:17 prophesied that Amaziah's sons will die by the sword, but according to 2 Chron. 26:1,21, Amaziah's son Uzziah died of leprosy.
• According to Gen. 15:18, Gen. 17:3,8 and Deut. 1:7-8, Abraham and his descendants, the Israelites will unconditionally(Deut 9:3-7) own all the land between the Nile River and the Euphrates River, but it never happened: they never owned all that land^[22]. God broke his promise, as conceded in Acts 7:5 and Heb 11:13.
• According to Isa. 17:1, Damascus will be destroyed, but in fact Damascus is one of the few ancient cities that has never been destroyed.
• According to Jer. 42:17, Jews who choose to live in Egypt will all die and leave no remnant. But history shows that Jews continued to live there for centuries, later establishing a cultural center at Alexandria.^[23]

Jehoiakim prophecies

• The prophet Daniel states that in the third year of the reign of King Jehoiakim, Nebuchadnezzar will conquer Judah(Daniel 1:1-2). The third year of Jehoiakim’s reign was 606 BCE, at which time Nebuchadnezzar was not yet king of Babylon. It was in 597 BCE that Nebuchadnezzar takes Jerusalem, by then Jehoiakim had died.
• Jeremiah prophesied that the body of Jehoiakim, king of Judah, would be desecrated after his death(Jer. 22:18-19, 36:30-31), however his death was recorded in 2 Kings 24:6, where it says that "Jehoiakim slept with his fathers." This is a familiar Bible expression that was used to denote a peaceful death and respectful burial. David slept with his fathers (1 Kings 2:10), and so did Solomon (1 Kings 11:43). On the other hand, 2 Chronicles 36:5-6 states that Nebuchadnezzar came against Jehoiakim, bound him in fetters, and carried him to Babylon. Judging from the treatment Zedekiah was accorded when the Babylonians bound him and carried him away to Babylon (Jeremiah 52:9-11), one might justifiably argue that his body probably was desecrated after his death. Jeremiah, however, predicted that Jehoiakim's own people would be his desecraters, that his own people would not accord him lamentations appropriate for a king, that his own people would cast his body "out beyond the gates of Jerusalem."
• Part of the desecration prophecy was that Jehoiakim would "have no one to sit upon the throne of David" (36:30), but this too was proven false. Upon Jehoiakim's death, his son Jehoiachin "reigned in his stead" for a period of three months and ten days (2 Chron. 36:8,9; 2 Kings 24:6-8). Even more devastating than that are the biblical genealogies that show Jehoiakim to be a direct ancestor of Jesus (1 Chron. 3:16-17; Matt. 1:12).^[9]

The imminence of the second coming

See also: Second coming

Jesus prophesied that the second coming would occur during the lifetime of his followers.

For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every man according to his works. Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom. Matt 16:27-28 But when they persecute you in this city, flee ye into another: for verily I say unto you, Ye shall not have gone over the cities of Israel, till the Son of man be come. Matthew 10:23 (see also Matt 24:29-35, Mark 13:30-31, Mark 9:1, Luke 9:27, John 21:22, Matthew 26:64, Mark 14:62)

This prophecy is also seen in the Revelation of Jesus to John.

The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified it by his angel unto his servant John: Behold, he cometh with clouds; and every eye shall see him, and they also which pierced him: and all kindreds of the earth shall wail because of him. Even so, Amen. Rev 1:1,7 Behold, I(Jesus) come quickly, blessed is he that keepeth the sayings of the prophecy of this book. And, behold, I(Jesus) come quickly and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be. He which testifieth these things saith, Surely I(Jesus) come quickly. Amen. Even so, come, Lord Jesus.Rev 22:7,12,20

Despite the strongly repeated promises, Jesus has not come quickly or shortly according to critics.

Apostle Paul also falsely predicted that the second coming would be within his own lifetime.

"Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord" 1 Thessalonians 4:16, KJV (see also 1 Corinthians 7:29-31, Romans 13:12, I Corinthians 15:51-54)

Christian apologist C.S. Lewis calls it the "most embarrassing verse in the Bible". In his book "The World's Last Night", C.S. Lewis wrote:^[24],

“

"Say what you like," we shall be told, "the apocalyptic beliefs of the first Christians have been proved to be false. It is clear from the New Testament that they all expected the Second Coming in their own lifetime. And, worse still, they had a reason, and one which you will find very embarrassing. Their Master had told them so. He shared, and indeed created, their delusion. He said in so many words, ‘this generation shall not pass till all these things be done.’ And he was wrong. He clearly knew no more about the end of the world than anyone else." It is certainly the most embarrassing verse in the Bible. Yet how teasing, also, that within fourteen words of it should come the statement “But of that day and that hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels which are in heaven, neither the Son, but the Father.” The one exhibition of error and the one confession of ignorance grow side by side. That they stood thus in the mouth of Jesus himself, and were not merely placed thus by the reporter, we surely need not doubt. Unless the reporter were perfectly honest he would never have recorded the confession of ignorance at all; he could have had no motive for doing so except a desire to tell the whole truth. And unless later copyists were equally honest they would never have preserved the (apparently) mistaken pre­diction about “this generation” after the passage of time had shown the (appar­ent) mistake. This passage (Mark 13:30-32) and the cry “Why hast thou forsaken me?” (Mark 15:34) together make up the strongest proof that the New Testament is historically reliable. The evangelists have the first great character­istic of honest witnesses: they mention facts which are, at first sight, damaging to their main contention.

”

Messianic Prophecies

See also: Judaism's view of Jesus and Jewish messianism

See also: Jewish Messiah claimants

According to many Christians, the fulfillment of the messianic prophecies in the mission, death, and resurrection of Jesus proves the accuracy of the Bible and that Jesus is the Son of God, however according to common beliefs of Judaism, Christian claims that Jesus is the textual messiah of the Hebrew Bible are based on mistranslations^[25][26][27] and Jesus did not fulfill the qualifications for Jewish Messiah.

[edit] The Bible and science

Main article: Science and the Bible

[edit] See also

• Bible errata
• Biblical Criticism
• Biblical inerrancy
• Misquoting Jesus
• The Skeptic's Annotated Bible

[edit] References

[edit] External links

• Bible Research - The Gender-Neutral Bible Controversy
• Introduction to the Bible and Biblical Problems
• Why won't God heal amputees? - A critical look at Christianity and the Bible by Marshall Brain
• "Difficult Texts" by Bonna Devora Haberman. How do we study difficult Jewish texts without apologizing for, justifying, or historicizing them?
• Examination of the Prophecies - Examination of the Old Testament Prophecies of Jesus by Thomas Paine

v • d • e Criticism of religion Belief systems Atheism  · Buddhism  · Christianity  · Hinduism  · Islam  · Judaism  · Monotheism  · Mormonism  · Scientology Organizations Catholic Church  · Seventh-day Adventist Church · Jehovah's Witnesses Texts Bible  · Qur'an People Jesus  · Moses  · Muhammad