Talk:Crest (heraldry)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Heraldry and Vexillology Portal

Crest (heraldry) is within the scope of the Heraldry and vexillology WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of heraldry and vexillology. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. (FAQ).

Contents

[edit] Improvement drive

Heraldry has been nominated to be improved by Wikipedia:This week's improvement drive. Vote for this article there if you want to contribute. --Fenice 19:56, 16 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image

I removed this image:

[[Image:Crest.jpg]]

since it shows only a shield and a motto scroll, and (as the text says) use of the word "crest" to mean a shield is inaccurate. There are many full heraldic achievements on Wikipedia, and we may be able to cut a crest out of one of them and use it as an example on this article. 66.92.237.111 01:56, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] bird

What's a familiar Old World bird that has a crest? (I'm American.) —Tamfang 07:13, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

A chicken (if a chicken's comb is a crest). Kpalion 16:14, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Family Crest

I removed the "family crest" item with the intention of adding something similar to Heraldry. The language was a bit misleading: "arms and crest are granted to one person only" implies that they cannot be inherited. —Tamfang 07:22, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

No such thing of course. Arms are granted to one person only (who passes it on, on death), the crest being part of the arms. Kittybrewster 13:40, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
So the use by, say, the present duke of Argyll of a given crest does not imply that he's a member of the same family as the first duke of Argyll? Get a grip. —Tamfang 18:45, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
Of course he is a descendant of the first Duke. As is, say, his brother. But his brother is not thereby entitled to usurp his arms or his crest or otherwise hold himself out to be the present Duke. - Kittybrewster 22:10, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
And do the brother's arms, if any, not express a very specific family relation? —Tamfang 04:08, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
The brother may take a similar coat of arms, but NOT the same one, TRADITIONALLY. If somone were to use a crest/coat of arms not belonging to them, they could be executed! - Traditionally... (RG 19:34, 2 March 2006 (UTC))
Will I ever be allowed to mention the fact that kinsmen customarily bear similar arms without someone responding that it's against the rules (in some countries) to bear identical arms? Does a cadency mark make you blind to the similarity and its significance? —Tamfang 19:41, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
In what countries is that allowed? In Scotland a cadency mark cannot be added other than (a) by eldest son and his eldest son and (b) by approval of Lord Lyon Kittybrewster 22:22, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
In what countries is what allowed? —Tamfang 22:07, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
Did Kitty really say that younger sons in Scotland may not bear differenced versions of the not-family arms, even with Lyon's approval? If so, Moncreiffe's Simple Heraldry (the book that got me hooked on the subject at age 14) gave me one heck of a bum steer. —Tamfang 19:54, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
The younger sons can bear differenced versions of their father's arms ONLY with Lord Lyon's approval. - Kittybrewster 11:43, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
But you forgot European tradition, where every member of family have same arms as head of family. Yopie 17:53, 30 January 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yopie (talk • contribs)

[edit] Mon / Kamon

What is the source of the bald statement that a mon is a crest? I think that by definition it is not a crest. It seems to be a symbol of some kind. Kittybrewster 13:40, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Crests aren't symbols? Mon were sometimes worn on helmets, I believe, which would make them crests. —Tamfang 19:55, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Belt~

"While it is not strictly correct, there is a convention that a crest may be displayed within a belt and buckle by persons other than its legal bearer, signifying non-ownership."

Is this true anywhere outside of Scotland? If it isn't then we should be more specific but I won't edit as it may exist somewhere else. Alci12 15:02, 27 June 2006 (UTC)