Talk:Crash Nitro Kart
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] CVG Assessment
This is in regards to the request for assessment from the CVG Assessment page. I am rating this article as Stub-class, despite it's length. A quick overview, from the top.
- Lead- rather short, but passable.
- Gameplay- What? "It's like this other game, but different." Right. You need to actually describe the gameplay, and what the heck is going on. Who's Velo, who's Oxide, and what is a CNK token? Write the article as if the reader has no clue what Crash Bandicoot is, has never played this game, or any other game.
- Story- I'll be blunt. Don't rewrite this section. Delete it, and start again. I'm not sure if this is just ripped out of the game manual, or if you worte this yourself, but it's completely unusable. Wikipedia is written in a 3rd-person perspective- not second, and certainly not first!
- Everything after that- delete it. Have a section on the characters, written in paragraph form, describing who they are and the cart they race in. No poses! No lists! Same with the tracks- a short paragraph on the various types of tracks in the game. Not a list of gameguide material! And take out the trivia section- if its' trivial, it doesn't need to be in the article.
If I seem a little snippy, it's because reading the story section really made me angry. This is the first time that I've actually lowered an article's rating when assessing. This article needs a lot of work to get back to Start-class, much less higher. --PresN 02:07, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
- The Nitro Kart page is written more-or-less in exactly the same way as the Team Racing page. I don't hear anyone complaining about that. Why complain about this? CBFan 19:33, 27 January 2007 (UTC)CBFan
[edit] Request For Comment: IP actions
This is an official notice of an RfC opened 15:17, 30 January 2007 (UTC) on Crash Nitro Kart. Two IPs are currently locked in a heated edit war concerning the substance of the article. The edit summaries on the history page are being used to voice opinions, rather than the talk page. Both parties seem to me to have violated WP:3RR many times over; I've requested semi-protection until this can be sorted out. --HubHikari 15:17, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Can't we at LEAST revert back?
Can't we at least revert back to the version BEFORE the tag was introduced? That way, it's neutral. And I'd also like to tell Mr Speculator to stop vandalising threads, starting arguments and blaming them on other people. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by CBFan (talk • contribs) 17:35, 30 January 2007 (UTC).
[edit] OK, if we must change it, I'd like to request two things.
- That we adjust the Team Racing article as well, as it otherwise promotes biasey.
- We adjust the storyline and character line-up without going back to the original version, as it is speculative, repetitive and Crunch's bio is somewhat lack-luster.
I request everyone leaves it alone :(
[edit] Resolution.
I and 86 (insert real IP number here) have now managed to resolve our differences. I believe that the article can be unblocked now safely without fear of more problems. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.219.92.36 (talk) 11:32, 2 February 2007 (UTC).
- Good, but you should have also removed it from the RFC page so people wouldn't waste time coming here when they could have been helping other disputes that aren't yet resolved. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Petershank (talk • contribs) 21:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC).
[edit] Did Tiny became king of the galaxy
He became king of Terra —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sonicrules (talk • contribs) 16:13, 18 February 2007 (UTC).
- That was somewhat pointless. King of one planet does not equal the king of the entire galaxy
[edit] Useful web page
I found this webpage on the graphics of Crash Nitro Kart ([1]). Perhaps it could be of use. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 22:41, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

