Talk:Computer vision syndrome
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at the doctor's mess. |
| Start | This page has been rated as Start-Class on the quality assessment scale |
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance assessment scale |
To member that added the prod tag: Please bring up concerns in the talk page to see if they can be resolved before starting deletion procedures. A term being unscientific does not automatically mean its article should be deleted. This is an encyclopedia, not a science journal. If anything, this article should be improved to demonstrate how this term is used popularly but not much in medical science. And a google search reveals that this term is used frequently, so the article should stay. Vic sinclair 04:46, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Temporary Condition
A mention should go to the fact that CVS is a TEMPORARY CONDITION to ease the minds of parents (regarding their children's computer use) about the myths associated with this issue —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.189.212.154 (talk) 16:40, August 28, 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Disease?
Should CVS be classified as a disease if its only a temporary condition? Its like saying muscle fatigue after a sporting contest or exercise is a disease! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Purpleone (talk • contribs) 16:52, August 28, 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Bill Nye the Science Guy Video
That video is nonsense, Please do not put back on this page thx!
It is also obvious he is clearly just a puppet for some sleazy health care company trying to scare parents into signing up with their rip off money hungry programs. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Purpleone (talk • contribs) 14:25, August 30, 2007 (UTC)
- That's your personal opinion, period. Duhman0009 12:19, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Sources
There do seem to be some book sources that can be used to make this article into something verifiable, instead of just linking strange web junk. Dicklyon 23:43, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Duhman0009 obsession with the Bill Nye Video
The video has a clear advertising in the background. (which is not allowed on wikipedia)
The video is full of generalized NONSENSE information based on NO EVIDENCE. He is not an optician, he is some self righteous science man.
The Video clearly just wants to scare people. It is just webjunk. --Purpleone 18:35, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
And there are plenty of good book sources we can use for the article, as I pointed out above. Nye is unlikely to have anything reliable to add, so an external link would seem to be inappropriate. Dicklyon 19:41, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
