User talk:CJ DUB
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Civility
Could you please not post on my page? The edits you are talking about were not even me (example, the FOAD, i dunno what that even means). As for saying ``BS``, there is isn`t any protocol for notes for deleting unsolicted opinions on my own talk page. Please refrain from posting there unless you have something constructive to mention, cheers CJ DUB (talk) 04:46, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
You are right, there are no rules regarding you deleting comments on your own talk page, I delete comments myself, as and when I feel the need. However, there certainly are rules regarding civility, you must remain civil at all times, that includes your edits, your edit summaries, and even the edit summaries on your own talk page.
FOAD is a well known explicit insult, and the edit was talking about was quite obviously made by you, as it was posted from your account 02:05, 21 August 2007 CJ DUB (Talk | contribs) m (5,351 bytes) (foad) (undo) it is highly unlikely that you were unaware of the meaning of the term FOAD, the chances of you typing 4 random letters and coming up with a well known insult is close to zero.
I don't care if you delete my comments, or if you make edits that have content that I don't agree with, just watch your tone while on wikipedia.Sennen goroshi (talk) 05:02, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
- RE FOAD: Oh yeah that one. That was FOUR MONTHS AGO! That user was warned by wikipedia as well as by me to stop posting incessant messages on my on my page, re: his love for Dominic Hasek. I was getting one every day. Maybe you should follow the whole thread before you comment. Also, what business is it of yours to police incidental conflicts on wikipedia, that have NOTHING to do with you? I have been writing articles forever, and i happen to be a ruthless, unbiased editor when it comes to fancruft on wikipedia, as per wiki mandate. I just get tired of dealing with little 12 yo's all the time. Finally, don't insert comments into the middle of discussions on my talk page. CJ DUB (talk) 16:20, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
please remain civil. Sennen goroshi (talk) 16:47, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
- Hey buddy, I had a look at YOUR user page and history; it seems like maybe you shouldn't be the one lecturing me on civility, facts, editing. You have quite a history of making abusive edits and bigoted slurs, especially against Korean pages and koreans. Let me know how your banning goes. Love, CJ DUB (talk) 16:54, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] York Castle
Let me add my request for a little civility on your part, CJDub. One can be executed by hanging in chains. Had you clicked on the link to Roger Akse in the York Castle page, you would have seen a sentence talking about the pros and cons of hanging (by rope), drawing and quartering vs hanging in chains. Both are forms of execution; apparently the issue is one of intensity of pain versus its duration. In any case, I will be investigating the issue of the hanged/hung usage further to see what is appropriate in this case. Acad Ronin (talk) 14:02, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- Its a direct quote from the guide book. CJ DUB (talk) 16:43, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- I was not objecting to the quote. I was objecting to the gratuitous LOL portion of the remark, which was especially unwarranted given that a little checking would have revealed that apparently it was incorrect. To descend almost to your level - ROFLMAO. Acad Ronin 02:38, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Vandalism_and_incivility
| Hello CJ DUB. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue that you may be involved with. You are free to comment at the discussion, but please remember to keep your comments within the bounds of the civility and "no personal attack" policies. Thank you. |
--Appletrees (talk) 14:15, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] 12 year old editors
The comment about 12 year old editors on your user page is inappropriate. Wikipedia can be edited by anyone, and this sort of comment is counter productive. Please would you remove it. Thanks. Kelpin (talk) 10:13, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
- Actually I made a comment about 12yo Wannabe editors. Nothing wrong with that, and nothing wrong with 12 yo editing wiki.
[edit] Request for arbitration
A request for arbitration has been placed at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Korean cuisine. The arbitration involves not only the issues with Korean cuisine but the issues with editing the article South Korea and the civility of multiple editors.--Chef Christopher Allen Tanner, CCC (talk) 07:32, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
