From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Cinnabar is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project. |
 |
This article is also supported by WikiProject Chemistry. |
| Start |
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. |
| Mid |
This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale. |
|
Article Grading: The following comments were left by the quality and importance raters: (edit · refresh)
The first known use of cinnabar is referred in the dolmenic burial "La Velilla", in Osorno (Palencia, Spain), where well-preserved human bones were carefully covered by large amount of pulverized cinnabar (5000 B.C.). The mercury-based composition of the cinnabar makes the preservation of the osseous remains possible by preventing the activity of destructive microorganisms (The Lancet, 1994 Dec 24-31;344(8939-8940):1776-7).
Vermilion proved to be useful in the preservation of human bones 5000 years ago. In the dolmenic burial at La Velilla’ in Osorno (Palencia, Spain) human bones have been found remarkably well preserved coated in powdered cinnabar (vermilion), surviving in unfavourable climate conditions. The powder was deliberately added as a preservative since there was no cinnabar mine within a radius of 160 km, because of the large amount present (hundreds of kilograms), and because its composition (mercuric sulphide red) is similar to that of preparations used in embalming. This discovery alters the date of the use of mercury ore as a preservative for human remains by at least 1000 years in Europe. Human bones coated in cinnabar-containing paint were recently discovered in a 900-1000 BC tomb in a Middle Sican burial in Peru. This type of preservation has not been previously reported in Europe or the Middle East;however, cinnabar was found in so-called Algar Culture tombs, in south-east Spain, and mercury was found in an amulet in an Egyptian tomb dated around the 16th century BC. Before the discovery at La Velilla, it was believed that European races did not make use of the bacteriostatic properties of mercury-based antiseptics, until the time of Paracelsus, when it was applied in epidemic new diseases such as syphilis or morbus gallicus, exanthematic typhus, and the anglian exudation. The good state of the bones at La Velilla was attributable to mercuric sulphide, which makes possible the preservation of bone by preventing the activity of destructive microorganisms. Cinnabar was used in embalming as late as the 19th century. William Hunter was the first to inject vermilion (dispersed in a mixture of turpentine essences, lavender oil,and camomile oil) in the femoral arteries of corpses, which was hailed as a revolution in the art of embalming. The relatives of individuals buried in La Velilla probably paid a high price in terms of their health. We now know that the mercurial vapours that arise during vermilion preparation in cinnabar grinding cause serious irritation of the lungs (chemical pneumonia), kidney disease,and moderate disturbance of the digestive system, accompanied by a metallic taste. Finally, the cinnabar used at La Velilla seemed part of a unique ritual. The evidence leads us to think that 100 or so people were buried once the soft tissue had decomposed and only their bones remained. The bones were then dipped in vermilion and placed in the dolmen. There is some evidence, however, indicating that some tissue adhered to the bones. Other features that reinforce the hypothesis of a unique ritual are: the ten great stone blocks that were the dolmen foundations lay horizontally (instead of vertically, as is usual), fireplaces were made before laying of the dolmen floor, and special spatula-like shaped bone idols (worked onovicaprid tibiae and carved with geometric themes or with female forms and also stained in vermilion) were placed alongside the dead. J Martín-Gil, F J Martín-Gil, G Delibes de Castro,P Zapatero-Magdaleno, F J Sarabia-Herrero
|
'what value does cinnabar have?' Is Cinnabar the same as Vermilion? If no, what's the difference? My dictionary lists both as translations of the German de:Zinnober. --212.144.165.5 10:13, 22 May 2004 (UTC)
Vermilion is the standard name in English given to the red artists' pigment based on artificially made mercuric sulfide, while cinnabar is the name given to the natural mineral. See:http://www.naturalpigments.com/detail.asp?PRODUCT_ID=450-10S
81.84.78.118 18:31, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] reference for the toxicology
- P. Jitaru and F. Adams (2004). "Toxicity, sources and biogeochemical cycle of mercury". Journal de Physique IV France 121: 185-193. doi:10.1051/jp4:2004121012. </ref>
- Z.-Y. Huang, J.-C. Shen, Z.-X. Zhuang, X.-R. Wang, F. S. C. Lee (2004). "Metallothionein as a biomarker for mercury in tissues of rat fed orally with cinnabar". Applied Organometallic Chemistry 18 (6): 255 - 261. doi:10.1002/aoc.627. </ref>
- T. S. Yeoh, A. S. Lee, H. S. Lee (1986). "Absorption of mercuric sulphide following oral administration in mice". Toxicology 41 (1): 107-111. doi:10.1016/0300-483X(86)90108-3. </ref>
- Kangyum E., Oransky S. H. (1992). "Chinese Patent Medicine As A Potential Source of Mercury-Poisoning". VETERINARY AND HUMAN TOXICOLOGY 34 (3): 235-238. </ref>
Lewis, Richard J., Sr, (2003). Sax's Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials (10th Edition) Volumes 1-3. John Wiley & Sons. Online version available at: http://www.knovel.com/knovel2/Toc.jsp?BookID=707&VerticalID=0 Mercury Sulfide is given the highest Hazard Rating (3 on a scale of 1-3) --Atcack 04:01, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Merger
It seems to me that the Mercury sulfide page is frankly rather pointless. It contains very little information. I just thought it would be more productive to have them on the same page (especially since each page says its the same as the other...). I would also accept leaving Mercury sulfide as the parent page if that was thought to be more appropriate and beneficial. Slithytove2 10:23, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
I also considered adding Vermilion to the list to be merged also, but it seemed that it was more... or maybe not? any suggestions? (note the question at the very top of this page.) Slithytove2 10:26, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
- No, the cinnabar article should focus on the mineralogy aspects, whereas purely chemical data and uses should be in a separate article on the chemical compound. Perhaps we need to shift some content - some duplication will remain, but the two should remain separate as should vermillion. Vsmith 12:10, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Merge It is tha same like edible salt and sodium chloride have to merge. There is a difference between the mineral or ore and the chemical substance!--Stone 12:55, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
I've removed the merge tags. --Ligulem 16:52, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Medicinal Use
IMO reference to arsenic is superfluous and should be removed 195.38.93.206 13:37, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Cinnabon
Any relation to Cinnabon? The first five six lettars are the same. D-Fluff has had E-Nuff 00:47, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 07:52, 10 November 2007 (UTC)