Talk:Chrysler Town and Country
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of Wikipedia Project Automobiles, a collective approach to creating a comprehensive guide to the world of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you are encouraged to visit the project page, where you can contribute to the discussion. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the importance scale. | |
Contents |
[edit] Merge
There is no purpose of this article as it stands. In my opinion, "Chrysler Town and Country" should be a disambiguation page discussing the various vehicles using this name (not just the modern minivan), and all minivan content should be merged with Dodge Caravan. There are not sufficient differences between these vehicles to justify all this duplicate text. --SFoskett 14:45, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
- No, not all Chrysler Group minivans should be merged with the Dodge Caravan article. Previously there was a "Chrysler minivans" article, and the content was later split up (after a discussion, I believe) into the separate articles. Leave them alone and let the articles develop. Think about the international differences also. - Slo-mo 03:08, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
I agree with Slo-mo, they are separate cars, yes they are similar in many ways but they are different in many ways. - Bavaria 19:35, 11 Febuary 2006 (UTC)
There is really no need for a merger. If you remember there was a merged article before but it got so long it was hardly legible. If you haven't noticed yet the articles are beginning to go their separate ways and if you merge them now all progress will be lost. 24.63.10.62 19:41, 12 February 2006 (UTC) Note:This comment was also made by User:Bavaria
Leave the Voyager, Town and Country, and Caravan separate! Note:This comment was also made by User:Bavaria
- As mentioned above, these articles were recently re-split after a discussion. Merging them would just create a bigger problem. Admittedly, these articles are for the time being very similar, however that is only because not enough time has been allowed to let them develop. When I split them, I didn't add any brand-specific info, but only made minor changes to have the articles make sense. Just give it some time. Please see Talk:Chrysler minivans for the previous discussion. Airline 00:52, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
leave them apart!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Newestguy1 (talk • contribs) .
i just wanted to note that not only would it be long, it would just look like you stacked the the articles on top of each other, making the merger rerundant. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.30.180.180 (talk • contribs) .
I think the merge is not a good idea. If the vehicles were somehow related in any way other than name and the fact that some of them were woodys, then it would make sense. In this case it doesn't. Bcirker 15:17, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
See, I suggested the merger because "pre-1990" sounds a bit awkward. The name was used much longer before it became a minivan. --Jnelson09 16:03, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Images
The Second and Third Generation Images could be improved. The Second gen. is a rear image that is not of great quality, and the third gen. is a Dodge Caravan not a Town and Country. I agree with 24.63.10.62 that there should be better images. Bavaria 12:25, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Town & Controversial
Uhh, if the name was used on several Mopars, why aren't they on this page?
Also, I changed "Town & Countries" to "Town & Countrys", because it's a name, so "-ys" is correct. (See Talk:Lend-Lease Sherman tanks for debate on why not...) Trekphiler 04:04, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
This page is dedicated to the minivan Jon the dodgeboy 06:51, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Town/Country?
I remember somewhere that the Town trim was a sedan on old Chrysler vehicles, and the Country trim was a station wagon, or something to that effect. Does anyone know what I'm talking about? Zchris87v 20:50, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Soccer Mom Van
Ok i know soccer moms, and most of them are dumb and dont know how to drive, at a hyundai dealer,a man showed us a town and country instead of a much better and reliable sienna, since they didnt have one at the moment, my sister was waiting for a soccer ball to come out of the car, she whispered (i dont like this van, its icky) which then later on she told us that that's a soccer mom car, well that was the thought i had in the back of my head, so i just sugest that u dont get this car because of the features that it doesnt have, the reliability, and the legend of the soccer mom!
Wow. Buddy, learn a little about cars, not only are Siennas uglier, the are less reliable. And, less comfortable. Not to mention the fact these are some of the best seeling mini-vans and you still see some of the older ones on the road today. People should not listen to you because of your stupidity, immaturity, and the legend of a babbling idiot!71.166.67.41 (talk) 01:53, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Where I Got The '08 Pic
The pic where I got it from was atop a truck that was driving. It was NOT at the car dealership! -- Bull-Doser 15:52, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] 4-Wheel disc brakes for Xler K?
I am considering converrtin the standard actory disc/drum brakes on my 1988 New Yoker FWD to the 11.1" rotorsfrom a Cravan/Voyager. Is there any information available on this topic?
Emery Eno e.eno@bcglobal.net 68.127.106.238 (talk) 18:05, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
