Talk:China Railways DF4
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. (assessment comments) |
| Mid | This article has been rated as mid-importance within the Trains WikiProject. |
 |
This article is within the scope of the Locomotives task force. |
 |
This article is part of WikiProject China, a project to improve all China-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other China-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as stub-Class on the quality scale. (add comments) |
|
More information about this article...
|
|
[edit] Move of this page / Renaming
I removed/-named this page back to the original DF4, as the renaming to China Railway Class did not make anysense in the context that the Chinese do not use this terminology and only (afaik) applies to British railways. Biscuittin, if you still want to move the page, please discuss it here first. Thanks, Poeloq
"China Railways DF4" then? The relevant style guide specifies the format (railway) (class) or (manufacturer) (model); it doesn't require the word "class", which I agree shouldn't be there if the country/company in question doesn't normally say "Class xx", and indeed isn't used in e.g.Category:EMD locomotives--QuantumEngineer 18:40, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Yes, I'd be happy with "China Railways DF4". We need more than just DF4 because that doesn't make clear that it is a railway locomotive. Biscuittin 22:21, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
This discussion continues at Category talk:Chinese rolling stock. Biscuittin 09:25, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
