User talk:Charoog10

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!


Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as If you are a Jump In fan and you like Keke Palmer,just watch the Runaway Love video,you will see the dumb Keke Plamer herself!) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Flyguy649 07:01, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Hot Stuff (I Want You Back)‎

Before reverting other editors' edits, you should familiarise yourself with, for example, our Manual of Style. Note also:

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

Edit summary text box

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 22:22, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hot Stuff (I Want You Back)

First, you're still not giving edit summaries; why not? Secondly, please see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (capital letters). --Mel Etitis (Talk) 11:12, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

If you continue changing capitalisation against the Wikipedia MoS, you may be blocked for disruptive editing. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 11:21, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
You've now added uncivil edit summaries to your behaviour. As I'm involved I can't block you myself, so I'll bring this to the attention of other admins. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 22:13, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Charoog, I'm taking it that you're acting in good faith, so I think we should all be cautious about accusing you of vandalism, as I've mentioned to Mel Etitis, but it would certainly be beneficial if you followed wiki style as in the manual. Also, you seem to at times have removed a tag noting that an article is not sourced in circumstances where ... well, the article was not sourced. That seems like a silly thing to get into conflict about. Also, making hostile edit summaries is not a good idea. Mel Etitis is a well respected editor and admin, so uncivil comments don't help your credibility. If there are underlying content issues, you can, of course, always try mediation. I hope these comments will help you to contribute in cooperation with other users here. Metamagician3000 06:27, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Please observe proper standards for attribution and wikification. In particular please do not make unsourced claims about the future - Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Also, we should follow the style guide - please put headings in correct format - we only capitalise the first word of a heading (apart from proper nouns, of course). Metamagician3000 10:26, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Doublethetrouble shoot.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Doublethetrouble shoot.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:07, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Final warning

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Steam (Nicole Scherzinger song), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 23:48, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

We have been through this. Wikipedia has guidelines and policies concerning editing, including specific styles for types of article, as discussed and decided at WikiProjects. You clearly have no interst in any of that, and edit as you want, regardless of anyone else. That's not acceptable. You might think that some bit of formatting looks prettier for an article in which you're interested, but if no other article of the kind uses it, it shouldn't be added. Again, you might have some private knowledge of facts, but if you add them to an article you have to give sources.
Most importantly, regarding the above warning, you must not remove templates such as {{unreferenced}} with no explanation, and without providing sources. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 10:04, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:ToadinMP8.png

Thanks for uploading Image:ToadinMP8.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:14, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Headstrong at.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Headstrong at.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:10, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits

You've continued to remove {{unreferenced}} templates without adding references, to revert articles from good to bad formatting and style, to move articles from correct to incorrect capitalisation (without correcting doublre redirects or changing the article in line with your new title), etc. As I'm involved in some of these articles I shouldn't really block you from editing myself; I shall therefore take steps to bring in other admins. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 09:17, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

Charoog, I've blocked you for 3 days for your disruptive editing. You've had plenty of warnings but refuse to respond to all talk messages, something you have previously been blocked for. I have blocked you for 3 days because the previous one day block didn't seem to have had any impact on you. Your disruption needs to stop right now. Please take a break and rethink your editing style. Sarah 13:23, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your message

If you're happy to edit according toWikipedia guidelines and policies, then of course we'll all be happy to have you here. You might want to read through the Wikipedia:WikiProject Music projects, so that you can avoid future problems. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 21:36, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

You've just removed the {{unreferenced}} template from Steam (Nicole Scherzinger song), wrongly capitalised a section heading, changed and added material with no sources... it looks as though your message was insincere. One last chance, before you receive a longer block. Do this sort of thing again, though, and there'll be no more warnings. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 22:17, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Template:The Pussycat Dolls

Please first discuss major changes to templates on their talk page. If you do this again without first discussing your proposed changes with other editors, you will be blocked. --Geniac 05:13, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Screenshot 3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Screenshot 3.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:11, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Beautiful-liar.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Beautiful-liar.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:06, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 96 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Geniac 19:59, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hot Stuff (I Want You Back)

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Hot Stuff (I Want You Back), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Cusulli 22:35, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Block

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 10:41, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Freakum-dress.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Freakum-dress.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShadowHalo 14:08, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disruption

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 08:40, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Archive

Regarding user talk pages, it is best to not delete notices, but instead, to archive them. You can find how to do this at Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page. Actively erasing non-harassing personal messages is often interpreted as hostile. In the past, this kind of behavior has been viewed as uncivil. For this reason, if your deletion of notices and concerns on your user talk page is to keep the "clutter" down, I suggest that you instead create archives for these messages. --Geniac 18:05, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disruption again

You're again changing correct to incorrect capitalisation, and creating articles with incorrect capitalisation (partly, at least, because the correctly capitalised version has been made a redirect). The next time I see you doing this, I'll block you again for disruptive editing, with no further warning. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 08:14, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 18:55, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome!

Hello, Charoog10, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

  Introduction
 5    The five pillars of Wikipedia
  How to edit a page
  Help
  Tips
  How to write a great article
  Manual of Style
  Fun stuff...

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Spellcast 16:25, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Screenshot_3.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Screenshot_3.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BigrTex 22:33, 9 July 2007 (UTC)