User talk:Chandler

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive
Archives
Archive 1 (2007)


Contents

[edit] Please do not critize a belief

Don't put God is a fictional character in books because He certainly not. Do not make fun a beliefs please. Countless believrs (including me) don't like atheism but you don't see us putting ATHEISM IS SHIIIAAAAAT!. I'm not saying you did but on the talk page you said 'the first line should be 'God is a fictional character in books like'". That was very offensive. Please refrain from such comments.--Angel David (talk) 19:55, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

The truth might hurt... Chandlertalk 21:01, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
And i will criticize and make fun of adults who think 1+1=5 just as much as I will make fun of adults who are religious. Chandlertalk 12:36, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Fragbite screen.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Fragbite screen.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 21:58, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Please play nice

I'd just like to informally remind you that, regardless of the dispute (I'm speaking of your personal attack on Talk:Kosovo), it's best to remain civil in all interactions with other editors. Thanks. SMC (talk) 06:20, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I am not gonna play nice with POV-ppl like him, they don't have anything to do on wikipedia. Chandlertalk 06:42, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Tv3sweden.svg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Tv3sweden.svg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 06:05, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Tv3sweden.svg

I have tagged Image:Tv3sweden.svg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 17:22, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Quidditchthroughtheages.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Quidditchthroughtheages.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Guest9999 (talk) 18:47, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Chronology of the Harry Potter stories

I've started a discussion here which you might like to contribute to. Regards, Guest9999 (talk) 12:00, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Civility

Just a little word to remind you that whatever the provocation the civility rules apply equally to edit summaries, so please don't do things like this Thanks. --Dweller (talk) 09:52, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Infobox Football league season

Hi, thanks for the message, it is fixed now. •Oranje•·Talk 13:15, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Differences

Unless verified by a third-party source it is near enough OR. Just sourcing the book and the film, does not prove anything was changed. Yeah, it's pretty obvious, but you can still argue it's just an interpratation. Therefore, unless a reliable source can be found which specifically states "this was cut", then it really can't be included. Gran2 07:57, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Liverpool

European Champion Clubs' Cup, apologies, you are correct - I interpreted the rule as allowing a replica to be made, with the original trophy remaiing with UEFA. I shall revert the edit. Jw2034 (talk) 12:00, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Just FYI

You ought to be aware that you've been namechecked at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Grant.Alpaugh. All the best, The Rambling Man (talk) 07:35, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Sorry for the Sock case. This was more about Grant then it was about you. Kingjeff (talk) 17:43, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Premier League titles

Regarding your edit to Premier League 2007-08, how can you imply that Manchester United have won 17 Premier League titles. There haven't even been that many seasons of the Premier League. Manchester United have won 10 Premier League titles, and to suggest that their Football League First Division titles should be counted with their Premier League titles is incorrect. – PeeJay 21:30, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Finals template

Hi there. Good work with the template so far. I just wondered if there was anyway you could add an "optional" line for scorers. If you look at FA Cup Finals, that list has scorers. Though I'm not sure the best way of doing it, just trying to throw some ideas about. Peanut4 (talk) 13:37, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Austria squads

Yup, I started the discussion! I think the naming of Austria Squad UEFA Euro 2008 is correct, but felt it would be right for that one to be deleted as it was made after Austria Squad 2008 Euro Cup (albeit one minute...). Then, this one can be renamed to a more correct title. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 11:50, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Helpdesk

It appears that a help desk request you submitted has been answered. Please take a moment a view the reply over there - if this doesn't quite help you, please feel free to ask for more information or clarification. Tiggerjay (talk) 15:41, 8 June 2008 (UTC)