Talk:Chase (bank)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Chasebank.jpg
Image:Chasebank.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:02, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] ANTI CHASE
I finally canceled my 2 checking accounts with Chase. I had these account for 11 years. Chase Bank sucks! If I tell you different stories how they treated me, it would take me 50 pages. In short I took an action and said : "NO MORE".
There is no reason for customers and consumers to keep having business with Bank that don't value business they have with them!
It took me awhile to detach but this was the best ethical decision I have made this month!
I simply don't want to have business with people who clearly disvalue me. It's not the only bank in the world.
Also none of my children ( potential customers ) will have business with Chase. If all unhappy people open accounts with good banks, maybe bad banks like Chase would not be open for much longer.
Because having business with Bank that clearly don't value customers is like bad relationship with a man or woman, in which you are clearly 1) financially used and taken advantage off 2) disvalued and 3) not worth of effort.
This is your money, not theirs, you should be in charge of how things are taking place, they should follow rules and regulations, and if they don't - leave them!!!!!!
Don't wait, just do it you can't possibly make mistake with a bank who don't value you.
Sincerelly, Anti Chase - Hana --76.209.233.23 06:49, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] THE FAMOUS WEBSITE CRITICAL OF CHASE BANK "CHASE BANK SUCKS" WAS TAKEN OVER
The website "Chase Bank Sucks" that contained complaints and bad experiences by consumers seems to be taken over, and all complaints deleted. Posters believe it was done by Chase Bank itself.
When you click on any of the links, there is an error page. If this is true, this would only indicate that Chase Bank is not happy about consumers speaking up their mind, and sharing their experiences publicly. As the matter of the fact the Bank is highly unpopular with consumers and we often wonder why and how this bank is still functioning.
The website "Chase Bank Sucks" had very helpful links how to fight for your consumer rights and how to contact federal, state and government agencies who could make a difference! Since "Chase Bank Sucks" is not functioning anylonger, tons of other consumers had opened up their private websites, pages, bloggs and continue to express their satisfaction.
Just one of the sites worth looking: http://www.consumeraffairs.com/credit_cards/chase_credit_cards.html --76.209.233.23 07:16, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Chasebank.jpg
Image:Chasebank.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 07:41, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Name change
This article seems to be trying to do two things at the same time:
- represent Chase Manhattan, prior to JPMorgan Chase
- represent Chase, the current retail banking division of JPMorgan Chase
Because Chase, the current bank, shares the same history as Chase Manhattan, but the name "Chase Manhattan" is no longer in use, I'm going to rename the article Chase (bank).
--JKeene 22:14, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
