Talk:Chaos Legion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Famicom style controller This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article is on a subject of Low priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0.
VG To-do:

Added a bunch of stuff. Previously was just "Chaos Legion is a videogame made by Capcom", so I added lots of more stuff. Seeing as how I'm not that far into the game, though, I'm unable to add a WHOLE lot...plus, I don't know that much about Wiki-ing. --TerminusEst13

Okay, who was the silly boy who added this into "Shooter stubs"? This game isn't a shooter. Moved to Computer and Video Game stubs. --TerminusEst13

Contents

[edit] Clean Up

Okay, I cleaned this up a little bit, added the legions and their abilities and fixed some errors. Anything else that needs to be changed?

Again, I cleaned it up and added a few more things. Unless something major needs to change, I'll stop updating. Baron Von Carnage 01:34, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

I felt this article could use some attention. It appears to have undergone some major overhauls even since the above comment was added. I have given the article a major revision. My complaints with the article before my revision are:
  • Overly flowery language. This is an encyclopedia.
  • Too much point of view and bias. It was written as from the view of a fan who viewed the game as receiving unduely negative reception. The music section, for one, obviously had a positive bias. I would respect such phrases similar to "garnered a cult-like following" if there were references. But most of it was just opinionated fluff that needed to go. A bit of cruft here and there, too.
  • No citations. Admittedly, I did not add any sources, but that does not nullify the fact that we don't have sources.
  • Too much unnecessary bolding and italics. It was all over the place. Judging from other video game article plot sections, I decided to remove nearly all of these.
  • The text before the contents table was far too lengthy. I deleted part of it for reasons pertaining to the others I have given, and the other part I moved into the gameplay section. The text before the contents now could probably use some revision however, and I would encourage someone to rephrase it.
  • Tense issues. The story section should be told in present tense to keep it consistent with other video game articles.
Wow, that's a lot of bullets. In any event, I would gladly welcome additions to the new version as much of my revision was chopping the article down. But I would like to ask that it not be reverted to the old version without a valid reason given here on the talk page. Even then, I would like to see many changes made to it. The article needs attention. Thanks in advance! --Trance 07:06, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] gameply change

I remove the two FPSs.I added the dynasty wariors link, for two reasons 1)it is part in the same genre, action/hack and slash, and 2)it is often discribe as a blend of Devil May Cry and Dynasty Warriors.Merc25 06:18, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Chaos legion.jpg

Image:Chaos legion.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:15, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Arcia seig.jpg

Image:Arcia seig.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 08:35, 27 October 2007 (UTC)