Talk:Celecoxib

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject Pharmacology (Rated B-Class) Celecoxib is part of WikiProject Pharmacology, a project to improve all Pharmacology-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other pharmacology articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome. B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. High This article has been rated as high-importance for this Project's importance scale. WikiProject Chemicals (Rated B-Class) Chemistry Portal Celecoxib is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project. B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale. Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. WikiProject Medicine (Rated B-Class) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at the doctor's mess. B This page has been rated as B-Class on the quality assessment scale Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance assessment scale

what are the sexaul side effects of celebrex I am taking a single dose of 200 mg per day for suspected rheumatiod arthritis ----good or bad?

You'd notice, wouldn't you? JFW | T@lk 06:28, 14 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Celebrex off the market

I'm not prepared to do so, but I believe this article needs someone to edit it in regard to Celebrex being off the market in the USA. One FDA link is not gonna be enough. 68.104.201.53 05:15, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Especially since I wouldn't want to be responsible for someone getting mistaken info off WP. 68.104.201.53

Or because it hasn't actually been withdrawn from the market? -Techelf 08:50, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] History section, as it was in the main article namespace.

==History== Apparently, Rochester claims that he should be entitled to the COX-2 patent (in a court claim).however, Pfizer took the patent because Rochester wasn’t able to prove evidence of written prescription requirements that will entitle him to the patent. [[User:Cutie sam|Cutie sam]] 04:44, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

• I'm not sure what to make of this. It seems unencyclopaedic/irrelevant, but maybe it isn't. It also has a signature in it - perhaps we should be clear that we'd like posts signed everywhere but the main namespace! -- (James McNally)  (talkpage)  10:32, 31 October 2006 (UTC)