User talk:Catswilltakeovertheworld1day

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

{{helpme}} On the Wellingborough page it says they are twinned with two cities they are not twinned with should i just remove it please check they are only twinned with germany and france not the other two. thanks Catswilltakeovertheworld1day (talk) 12:13, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi there! Well, it looks like the article is saying that Wellingborough is twinned with two cities in France and Germany (Niort and Wittlich). But it's written as "Niort, France and Wittlich, Germany", which simply means two locations, although it might not be really clear at first. If that's wrong info, you can remove it if you want, but be sure to source it with a reliable reference, or make sure to mention your reason in your edit summary. If you need any more help, feel free to ask me on my talk page, or add the {{helpme}} template to this page again. I hope that helps you, :) JamieS93 12:26, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

{{helpme}} Please help me!!!

What would you like help with?

[edit] Wellingborough

Oh, I didn't see that section. I thought that you were initially referring to the part in the lead. It's alright for you to remove those two cities, as long as you add a reference to back up your removal. You might want to add a statement at the top of the twin cities section, such as "Wellingborough is only twinned with two cities: Niort and Wittlich." Be sure to add a reference to that statement, by entering this in: <ref>http://www.YourReferenceWebsiteHere.com<ref> and replace the web address with a good reference online. And also mention something in your edit summary that describes why you're removing those other cities from the section. In short, yes, you're free to do it because Wikipedia is a wiki, but please make sure to give your reason and a source to back up the information. That way, you shouldn't run into the problem of someone reverting your unsourced edit. :) --JamieS93 13:21, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

{{helpme}}

Is someone please able to help me with the layout of my talk page???ThanksCatswilltakeovertheworld1day (talk) 13:37, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

• What specifically do you need help with? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 13:41, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

• Those are called userboxes. You can find info on installing them here and a list of them. note also that they go on your User page User:Catswilltakeovertheworld1day, not your talk page. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 13:52, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Talk page layout

I'm not sure what you're exactly wanting to know with that, but I can give you some basic stuff about user talk pages. Actually, all of it applies to Wikipedia in general, too.

• This -> ==Talk page layout== makes the above section header.^^ You can enter in "==something here==" to make a regular header that says "something here". That basic kind of formatting applies to talk pages, and everywhere else, like Wikipedia's articles.
• To indent your post, such as if it's a reply, add a ":" colon to the beginning of the sentence, and it will indent it to the right. Add two or more ":"s and it will be even more indented.
• Also, add the {{talkpage}} template to the top of this page, and you get:

• To add a bulleted list, like this one that I'm writing now, add an asterisk * to the beginning of each statement/words on the list, and it will create each "bullet" on the list.

I hope that helps. If you want to know anything else specific, just ask. And if you meant my userpage, I can give you info on that if you'd like, too. --JamieS93 14:01, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Do not remove my remarks from someone else's talk page. Doczilla _STOMP! 10:50, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Rugby union. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Doczilla _STOMP! 10:53, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

I removed them because it wont happen again.Catswilltakeovertheworld1day (talk) 10:56, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Ah, so you acknowledge that you're the same person, which means you already should have known better. Anyway, you do not get to touch someone else's talk page remarks. Doczilla _STOMP! 11:00, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Explain what? You just said that something you did as an anonymous user will not happen again. You cannot know that unless you were that person. We'd already figured out you were the same person for several reasons, but the confirmation was helpful.

You removed my remarks from another user's talk page. That's vandalism. Now go take a break from all this and seriously reconsider the use of your time. The block against your anonymous IP is going to apply to your username as well. Doczilla _STOMP! 11:05, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism, sockpuppetry, disruption. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Doczilla _STOMP! 11:06, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

You vandalized my comments regarding User:86.22.196.238. Your stated reason for doing was your promise that it would not happen again -- and you said that after I'd already figured out you were the same person. Doczilla _STOMP! 11:14, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

I have protected this page for the duration of the block. Do not remove block notices. The last box explicitly says, "Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked", and yet you removed it anyway. Doczilla _STOMP! 11:27, 1 June 2008 (UTC)