User talk:CardinalDan/Archive 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

Blanking user pages

Wikipedia policy explicitly permits users to blank their own talk pages. There is no requirement to archive. Undoing such blanking is, technically, vandalism. Please don't do it again. 136.8.152.13 (talk) 14:33, 23 January 2008 (UTC) Dear Dan my friend recently made fun of the us mint and i was tring to erase it. I am sorry if it made you mad —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexwg95 (talk • contribs) 14:34, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Non-constructive edits?

Which do you mean? Naturezak (talk) 20:16, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for catching this, CardinalDan. My computer was unattended and an officemate made this edit as a joke. I'll keep a closer eye on my account from now on.Naturezak (talk) 15:41, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
    • It's OK. I just am strict on vandals. CardinalDan (talk) 00:33, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

starting a new article

i dont know how to start a new article, some help would be nice :P ARK23 (talk) 22:33, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Did u look ? Keyshia Cole edits

Did u look? U kept reverting. How r my changes vandalisation? I did cleanup, & made the info clearer. The info I added has sources. What is the spam that the bot has a problem with ? 70.108.92.126 (talk) 15:22, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Toni Ann Gisondi

Please have the decency to wait until I actually save a new page before sticking a cleanup tag on it! Talk about jumping the gun - that was ridiculous! --Seahamlass (talk) 19:49, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

  • The page, right now, still needs some work in order to become a good wikipedia article. CardinalDan (talk) 19:51, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
  • And you point is??? I just STARTED it tonight - I'm NOT a miracle worker! You jumped on it seconds after I started it. That is NOT good Wikipedia practice!--Seahamlass (talk) 20:05, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Its alright, I was having a discussion with Nsevs about deleting nasty articles. These articles cause people to do nasty things. Average Citizen (talk) 00:54, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

[1] he's gonna hit me! haha. -- Naerii 15:25, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Poá article

I just removed content written in bad english, reverting the article to the most recent decently written version. Saulo Paiva (talk) 03:29, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page, and good job with RC patrolling. Best, Kaisershatner (talk) 13:35, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Worldwide Biggies

The company is definitely notable, and the article should not have been deleted until the legitimacy and authenticity of the claims had been reasonably investigated. (Google - it's so easy!) See the article's talk page for Ghits. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 18:47, 2 April 2008 (UTC)