User talk:136.8.152.13

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 136.8.152.13, is registered to Ford Motor Company, and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Other Ford Motor Company IP addresses:

Contents

[edit] January 2008

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User talk:136.2.1.101. Snowolf How can I help? 14:34, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

The right of blanking talk page is part of WP policy, but whether it applies to IP's talk pages too is not agreed upon. I'm not in favour of such an extension. Snowolf How can I help? 14:41, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

stop deleting your talk page, the policy does not include IP addresses--Lerdthenerd (talk) 14:49, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for clearing this up. He continues to make personal attacks to me stating something about the WP policy about IP talk vandalism. --AMRDeuce (talk) 14:53, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

I may have not been clear. What I meant is that it's not clear consensus whether the right to blank our own talk page is for IPs too and not only registered users. "The above rules do not apply to a user's own talk page.". I maintain that as IP, you're not allowed to. Best regards, Snowolf How can I help? 14:56, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you, that's more helpful. I have not made any personal attacks, on the contrary AMRDeuce has deleted some quite civil comments I made on his talk pages where I objected to his reversion of my comment on Snowolf's talk page. 136.8.152.13 (talk) 15:01, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Scottish Government

Hi, I notice you are editing a lot of pages to change mentions of "Scottish Executive" to "Scottish Government". I'm concerned that this involves a fair bit of "re-writing history", as the title "Scottish Government" wasn't officially used until 2007. Any mention of the "Scottish Government" doing things prior to this are therefore inaccurate. It was the "Scottish Executive" at the time.--Escape Orbit (Talk) 17:37, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Agreed - please look before you leap. Publications made by the then Executive should not be re-titled. Ben MacDuiTalk/Walk 09:34, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Petroleum, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Petroleum was changed by 136.8.152.13 (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2008-01-30T13:55:55+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 13:56, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Petroleum constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. -- pb30<talk> 13:57, 30 January 2008 (UTC))

[edit] February 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Engine cooling. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gwernol 15:26, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to NTFS has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Equazcion •✗/C • 12:26, 4 Mar 2008 (UTC) 12:26, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to The Salvation Army has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. · AndonicO Hail! 14:34, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] List of Sort Codes of the United Kingdom

Do not keep reinstating my earlier comments at User talk:Ian3055 and do not accuse me of vandalism for removing them. Your behaviour is now bordering on harrassment. Chrisieboy (talk) 12:18, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Chrisieboy (talk) 12:21, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

I am now reporting you for breach of the 3RR on this article. Chrisieboy (talk) 12:27, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
It does cut both ways, and I've not been the one not explaining my revertions. 136.8.152.13 (talk) 12:28, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
User Chrisieboy has also deleted my comments on a third user's talk page (Ian3055), and appears to be intent on a course of disruptive behavior. This is a lie, I have not deleted your comments as you are perfectly well aware, I only deleted my own. Chrisieboy (talk) 13:49, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Please see this diff: [1] where you clearly deleted my comment. 136.8.152.13 (talk) 13:52, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Your version is clearly not an improvement and removes information. You have made these changes without reaching consensus and against the wishes of two other editors. Chrisieboy (talk) 13:57, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
This would be more helpful on the article's talk page. I'm still unclear as to what your problem is, and I have explained why my edits were in line with policy. Reaching prior consensus is not a requirement for every edit. 136.8.152.13 (talk) 13:59, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

(reset) Please point me to precisely where the MoS mandates the changes you have made. Chrisieboy (talk) 14:58, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Tattoo do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Versageek 21:04, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Heart of England Business and Enterprise School has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 15:03, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Aston Villa F.C., you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The Rambling Man (talk) 08:22, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Land Rover and Jaguar

Hi! I've noticed that you've reverted Land Rover's and Jaguar's parent company from Tata Motors back to Ford several times. As your IP address is registered to Ford I guess you're well placed to know. Can you clear up for us whether the transfer from Ford to Tata has taken place yet and, if not, when it is scheduled to happen? -- Timberframe (talk) 15:46, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

[From my talk page] The sale is agreed, but has not completed. Ford remains the owner of Jaguar/Land Rover until the sale is completed. 136.8.152.13 (talk) 15:55, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the update on the present situation - I agree with you that until the sale is completed it is premature to show the parent company as Tata, even if it's only a matter of time before that becomes the case. Any idea when the sale will be completed and it will be appropriate to show Tata as the parent company? -- Timberframe (talk) 16:03, 19 May 2008 (UTC)