Talk:Carbon steel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject Metalworking, an attempt to cleanup, categorize and expand Wikipedia articles related to metalworking. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page or visit the project page, where a list of open tasks is maintained.


Contents

[edit] Heat treatment

Should the heat treatment stuff sould be moved to heat treatment?

Duk 18:19, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)

The article is shaping up well due to some good collaboration, maybe also because it is a well-bounded topic. Some reasons I think the heat-treatment section should stay:

  • There isn’t anything to say about carbon-steel apart from heat-treatment past the composition part, and even that is irrelevant without regard to its response to h-t. It would then become a dictionary entry.
  • The Heat Treatment article started as “specific to swords and knives”, a good place for tips particular to that art. In May it morphed into something else and then began to suffer from linking by word-association. Apart from heat treatment of carbon-steel, there are all the other steel alloys, all other metals, glass, seeds, milk, timber, gems, and so on. It will become a monster.

I suggest we clean up the Heat Treatment article, move it to Heat Treatment of Swords and Knives, and remove pointless red links from other articles. Meggar 03:29, 2004 Dec 23 (UTC)

How about: what is carbon steel good and less good for compared to other types of steel? -- Milo

[edit] References

If someone has a better way for me to list my references that would help alot, because most of my references come from the same book and it's just the page numbers that change. Wizard191 02:29, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Metrication

The article contain a mix of SI and non-SI units. Some sections of the article contain non-SI units, and these should be converted. I don't know for sure what Wikipedia's policy is regarding metrication, but some may find it helpful for both systems to appear in the article with SI units given prominence. Example: 0°C (32°F). --B.d.mills 10:39, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

  • Done Wizard191 16:08, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Does the carbide bur mean that one is made of carbon steel?--211.72.233.5 11:02, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] durability

How can the melting point be reduced while the temperature resistance is increased? Aren't those in opposite directions?68.180.38.41 09:26, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Good question. Just a guess: perhaps the creep temperature is increased? (The operating range of a metal doesn't go all the way up to its melting point.) That's just a guess, though. —Ben FrantzDale 18:07, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. Simple enough search finds carbon steel to be the nomenclature. Teke (talk) 17:51, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Plain-carbon steel → Carbon steel – As indicated in the article history, "plain carbon steel" is the industry term for the material. It is Wikipedia's convention to use the most common name, which is "carbon steel" in this case. Carbon steel is the name given in Encyclopedia Britannica, and Encarta refers to the material as "carbon steel" in articles such as "Carbon" and "Iron and Steel Manufacture". Also, "carbon steel" gets 1.3 million Google results whereas "plain carbon steel" gets 69,900, over 17 times less (the number of "plain carbon steel" results were subtracted, since those pages show up in a "carbon steel" search). -- Kjkolb 17:37, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Survey

Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" or other opinion in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~

  • Support, though is there a non-plain carbon steel? And would that article be long enough to merit its own, or should it be combined into carbon steel? And is it just me or is the content between the two articles pretty much the same? WLU 20:44, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Discussion

Add any additional comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

[edit] Changes in chapter "Types of carbon steel"

Now this was a bit of a mess...

  • There were four entries listing carbon content and manganese content. One was completely wrong: "Cast steel" is really cast iron and has usually more than 2.0% percent carbon. "ultra-high carbon steel" was left out instead. Interestingly, the main source for this chapter got it right and also used different amount of carbon as indicator.
  • Additionally, the information on the manganese content was quite irritating: It does not have anything to do with the carbon content, nor with the steel's capability to be hardened (the whole point of carbon). I think it detracts from the main point of this chapter, so I removed that, too. All needed to know about the manganese content is said in the fact that these are "low alloy" steels.
  • Still, I am not sure what depth would have been adequate: There are very few "plain" (aka. "low alloy") steels with more than 1.2% carbon. The is minimal hardness gain. In my understanding, more than 1.2% carbon is mainly used to counter out the effects of chromium (and other alloys)... but this means high alloy steels all the time, which seems not to be the point of this article. Any ideas how to explain all this without having redundant information? Tierlieb 23:34, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Request edit on simple page

Hi, the Simple.wikipedia.org version of this page refers to 'poopoo head' from vandal. I don't know the site well enough to edit, can this be fixed? Apologies for the format here as I say I am not familiar. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.152.176.35 (talk) 19:24, 25 March 2008 (UTC)