Talk:Canadian Forces ranks and insignia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
by the way...craftsman in frenc is artisan... and is evryone sur only ocdt is a subordinate officer rank? arent 2lt and lt as well with capt being junior?
- Only OCdt is a Subordinate Officer; 2Lts, Lts and Capts are Junior Officers. That's how the CF divvies them up. OCdts cannot be in the same grouping as Lts etc because OCdts do not hold a commission. -- SigPig |SEND - OVER 18:59, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
-
- Although it's amazing the number of them that think they do. ¥ Jacky Tar 16:02, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Spelling
Yes, Virginia, military ranks have odd spellings re their pronunciations. It may be pronounced "leftenant", but it is spelled "lieutenant"; likewise "bombardier" (a corporal in the artillery) retains the first "r" even though it's generally silent. Please check a Canadian Forces website or a dictionary before you start changing spelling. I can't wait for someone to decide we need "sarjunt", "capn", and "kernull". --SigPig 07:01, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi Sigpig, I was a Bombadier for 4 years, and it was always spelled that way. I will try to find another reference before changing. I am not the moron you make me out to be. Motorfix 16:14, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
You are correct...I check the RCA standing orders for rank..and I'll be, it has an R. For my next argument, Gunnner is spelled with three "n"s cheers,
Motorfix 19:15, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, Bdr. I knee-jerked (emphasis on "jerk") on two successive posts (the previous spelling Lt as "lieftenant"); I should have checked the signatures, and not assumed they were the same poster; and even so, I should have assumed good faith. Mmmm, tasty combat boot. No hard feelings, I hope. --SigPig 08:14, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Is there any other units that also make use of a different name for Master Corporal? I think RCHA uses Master Bombardier instead of MCpl but I could be wrong. Do any other units do the same?
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:CF LGen.jpg
Image:CF LGen.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:52, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Lots more to do here
Lots more to do here, I can see. Trade badges, qualification badges, the rest of the rank insignia, variants (CADPAT, desert CADPAT), cap badges... all kinds of fun! Images are going to be a problem, though, since every last one of 'em is subject to Crown copyright. Will start working on this. ¥ Jacky Tar 16:08, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

