Talk:Call of Juarez
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale. | |
|
VG To-do:
|
||
Since the game hasn't been released yet, and since this piece is promotional, perhaps there is no need for this piece.
I apologise, it isn't intended to be promotional,. And i thought if I could back up the ONE rumour mentioned that it would be acceptable, sorry. Can I delete it as the author?
It actually has a publisher in Europe now. So it's definitely coming out.
http://www.focus-home.com/game.php?produit=150&games=jeux
http://www.nzone.co.uk/object/nzone_thecallofjuarez_home_eu.html
Looks like the North American publisher will be Ubisoft.
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/thelawman/news.html?sid=6147075
I've rewritten the article (vastly smaller now, build from this version). Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 18:48, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Just made it look a bit more official. Feel free to add more substance.
[Ikickpuppies] I've added information on Billy and the Reverend, along with a link to my Video Review that shows the features mentioned in this Wiki.
[edit] this game sucks
shouldn't we try to let people know how much this game really sucks especially the billy levels. Someone might read the article think it's really good download it and get pissed off. It's also very buggy —Preceding unsigned comment added by JAIXSTAR (talk • contribs) 00:21, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Your personal opinion of this game is of no importance to the article. Bro.CaINE 09:28, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Adding in reviews, though, would be a good idea. As it is, the article is all plot. Other game articles generally have sections that would outline how well the game was received upon release. --clpo13(talk) 20:37, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Boxcallofjuarez.jpg
Image:Boxcallofjuarez.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:57, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
