Template talk:CAhistory

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Colour combination

Can we choose a colour combination that doesn't burn my eyes as harshly? --Wafulz 02:16, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

This has been a WP:CAL template for quite a while. Ronbo76 11:29, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Does that make it any less bad? ed g2s • talk 11:32, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

I am relatively certain that if members of the WP:CAL had not wanted those colors, they would have been changed long ago. I'd recommend a revert back, please. Ronbo76 11:33, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

And the members of WP:CAL know better than / have more authority than the rest of the community? Please put forward an argument based on the actual matter at hand, namely using a bright turquoise background, when every other infobox on the project uses the default stylesheet-set background (see also WP:ACCESS). ed g2s • talk 11:37, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

No, I am not suggesting that or ownership. Thanks, Ronbo76 11:41, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Good, we don't have to run every common-sense edit through every WikiProject that claims it under their scope. ed g2s • talk 11:45, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the change, it looks much better now. --Wafulz 22:32, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

I like with the color change too. That harsh blue with extreme saturation was not easy on my eyes, and gave me flashbacks to the 'bad old days' of the original IBM CGA graphics card of the early 1980s, which had a horribly restricted 16-color pallette. Bright colors don't work well as a background. - Itsfullofstars 19:44, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sacramento

Why isn't Sacramento on this template? Also, why is this locked? --Indolences 06:24, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Main page linked, auto-cascading lock down due to high visibility. The links are to "History of.." articles being as it is the history navbox. ed g2s • talk 11:34, 14 February 2007 (UTC)