Talk:Buzz Lightyear

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
B
This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
???
This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale.
Animation This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.
B This article has been rated as B-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject American Animation. (with unknown importance)
This article is supported by the Pixar work group. (with unknown importance)

Contents

[edit] Trivia

When Buzz opens the control panel on his left arm, the molded inscription reads, "MADE IN TAIWAN," a country known for its high-tech toys.

As far as I'm concerned, when talking about his buttons and whatnot, what does what, etc. I humbly support the inclusion of this information, as it does in fact help to explain some of the details of the movie, such as how Woodie can open Buzz' "dome," punch him in the face, then close the dome. More information is better than less.

Someone should talk about Buzz' "character development" during the first movie, where he sees the ad for himself and realizes that he's just a clone of a popular commercial product, just as Woody had foretold.

This Wikipedia entry deserves a B. But, maybe it's a C+.

--User:TorchPratt 13:47, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

== Consider this ==ZJZJGY5FJNREWHRE3WEQAMBNBNH3EHYHJFI4UTIUUYTTRGJHJL




2003BUZZBUZZBUZZTR53432GYHTJYHYJYT5YHY6Bold text'Bold text'Bold text

A large section of this article is not actually on Buzz Lightyear, but talking about his suit and equipment, should we keep this?--Rasillon 10:00, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Relation to Buzz Aldrin

Does anyone know if the character was named after Buzz Aldrin? Aledmb 12:32, 22 March 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Answer

Yes, the character was inspired by Aldrin. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.19.14.31 (talk) 03:26, 1 May 2007 (UTC).

Or not 85.227.226.168 11:47, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] slag?

What's a slag? It is a toy!

[edit] confusion

this article is quite confusing beetwen -THE TOY of toy story with fake technological suit and its very small size -THE SPACE RANGER of the tv serie that lives in a fictional hi-tech universe similar of "star wars" or "star trek"

[edit] Middle name

Why did soenmone put "Bundy" as his middle name? is it official or vandalism? That I'd like to know.65.173.90.94 10:16, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

As far as I know, Buzz does not have a middle name [[user:barry thimble]

This article is incredibly low-quality, in my opinion. Many of the article's parts appear to be the work of a ten year old or a very effective vandal, especially things like "fisical" and the rambling section about the character's invincibility.

In my opinion, this article could use a complete rewrite.

[edit] vandalism

I reversed the recent edits which included vandalism. Rather than sort through them all I just rolledback. regards --Npnunda (talk) 23:45, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Well you deleted the photo, and my edits which were decidely not vandalism, How about you act more appropriately with rollback rights?--Aujourd'hui, maman est morte (talk) 01:43, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

I reversed your edits again as Buzz Lightyear is showing up under the Category:People currently in space This is a category for Astronauts and not cartoons. I'll add the photo again. --Npnunda (talk) 01:54, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

See your talk page, category removed, could have been done without reverting the cited information I added. --Aujourd'hui, maman est morte (talk) 01:58, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
I stumbled into this discussion because of a edit conflict on Npnunda's talk page, it looks like Aujourd'hui, maman est morte's edit is on the page now so all is well. But Npnunda you can not use roll back just because it is easier, that is NOT what rollback is for. Never do that again, please read WP:ROLL! I can not stop Aujourd'hui, maman est morte to report you to ANI, but I think you should apologize and hope he he will not do it. --Stefan talk 02:15, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
I wanted to write that my use of rollback here was really stupid on my part. What was I thinking? I did fix this with Aujourd'hui, maman est morte and you can read about it on our talk pages if you so choose. Regards --Npnunda (talk) 02:50, 8 June 2008 (UTC)