Talk:Bumrungrad International

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Bumrungrad International is part of WikiProject Thailand, a project to improve all Thailand-related articles. The wikiproject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group on wikipedia aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Thailand-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.

Thailand To-do: edit purge Create more articles and expand existing articles in Category:Cities, towns and villages in Thailand Fix and add data for article Vehicle registration plates of Thailand (and why license plate of Amphoe Betong is available)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Southeast Asia, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Southeast Asia-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

	It is requested that a photograph or photographs be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in Asia may be able to help!
	The Free Image Search Tool (FIST) may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

This article certainly does read like an advertisement rather than a complete and objective description of the subject material.

Yet the individual who modified the article on January 12th 2008 did nothing to improve this aspect of the article, and simply removed the tags indicating that this article read like an advertisement. They also removed some information from the article (e.g. about ownership of the hospital) which was both objective and informative to readers, and was supported by appropriate references. Indeed, some more material of a "peacock" nature was added.

This is surely not good enough. No doubt this hospital is a very fine one, but in the interests of objectivity both positive and negative aspects should be aired.

Hopefully someone will truly sort out this article, and others like it, and then (and only then) it will be justifiable to remove the advertising and peacock term tags. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thailander (talk • contribs) 03:19, 13 January 2008 (UTC)