Talk:Brodie Foster Hubbard

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Biography Portal
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

This article is part of WikiProject Arizona, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Arizona.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article has been rated as Start-importance on the importance scale.
Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on 14 June 2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus.
This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Country Music, which is a project dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to country music. If you would like to participate or learn more about the project please visit the project page, where you can join and see a list of open tasks.

[edit] WP:MUSIC

Per Wikipedia guidelines:

  • Has been featured in multiple non-trivial published works in reliable and reputable media
  • Has become the most prominent representative of a notable style or the local scene of a city
  • Has won or placed in a major music competition
  • Is cited in notable and verifiable sources as being influential in style/technique in a particular music genre
  • Is frequently covered in publications devoted to a notable sub-culture

Notability has been asserted with multiple sources, all cited within the article. PT (s-s-s-s) 19:29, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] comment by annon

It's not vandalism if it's a valid question. Vanity pages are against Wikipedia rules, and this is a grossly apparent violation of that rule - to say nothing of the lack of relevance this guy has to the Phoenix music scene, no matter how he may delude himself by maintaining his own Wikipedia page.

Spend the ten bucks for a domain and cheap hosting, and quit soiling a valuable public resource with this crap. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.169.224.230 (talk • contribs)

OK, you've had you're say. However, I don't know of any evidence to support you're theory and your attacks are treading close to violating Wikipedia's policy for articles on living persons. (see WP:BLP) -MrFizyx 03:20, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
I have also been accused of being... Ryan Avery, Andrew Jackson Jihad, JRC, and Dain Q. Gore. I wrote articles about Arizona music, they are backed by reliable sources, all cited and asserting notability in the articles. These are not vanity pages. Parsssseltongue 00:31, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Several of the "references" have nothing to do with Mr. Hubbard or no longer exist. Where they do the source has nothing to do with the reference. Reference number one has nothing to do with his move and the only thing it has to do with Mr. Hubbard is the line "...and takes a poop on Brodie Hubbard." That reference has been changed to reflect that. Also reference number 7 does not corroborate Mr. Hubbard's alleged involvement in the said benefit. Also the reference to the Phoenix Vegan community is a "livejournal-esque" page, not a reliable source.Windowglass 08:41, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

If you don't think the article belongs here, then feel free to nominate it for deletion, but please do not vandalize the article. It has survived one deletion debate and may or may not survive another. -MrFizyx 13:28, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
I think I fixed everything in regards to what's not verifiable from the sources and links (see edit summary - fixed the vegan reference, nixed the influences trivia crap, made some sense of the "pooped on" article, etc.), but this and a lot of the Arizona based musician pages seem to be the victim of a lot of vandalism and personal agendas that are unfitting for Wikipeida. Maybe it's people who know the musicians involved, enemies or misguided friends or something, but unless their criticisms or weird references that seem otherwise like nonsense can be verified in the publications or other verifiable sources that were references in the articles written, they don't belong in the articles. Thewikichicky
Also I deleted the Mock back in Democracy part, because the reference that is sited is an interview with David Cross that makes no mention of Hubbard or other bands for that matter. Also shouldn't extra-curricular activities be incorporated into the biography part, maybe as a subsection of that, it is hardly enough material to warrant it's own section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.201.153.75 (talk • contribs)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Brodiehubbard.jpg

Image:Brodiehubbard.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:20, 12 February 2008 (UTC)