User talk:Brian Gunderson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Gloom.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Gloom.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:31, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Style note

Hi Brian. Just a quick note regarding this edit. Per style conventions, there should be no links in section headings. Links should instead be in the text. Cheers, Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 02:40, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of O-dogg fever

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as O-dogg fever, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 00:24, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to O-dogg fever, are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 00:25, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page, as you did with O-dogg fever, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Since it's clear you know exactly what you're doing, no more than this token warning is neccessary. 00:27, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. PhilKnight (talk) 00:58, 29 April 2008 (UTC)