Talk:Bounds Green tube station

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Trains Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list
	This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. (assessment comments)
Low	This article has been rated as low-importance within the Trains WikiProject.
	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Stations.
	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rapid transit.
	This article is within the scope of WikiProject UK Railways. Low Importance: low within UK Railways WikiProject.
	This article is within the scope of WikiProject London Transport.

	This article is part of WikiProject London, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to London. If you would like to participate, you can improve the article attached to this page or sign up and contribute in a wider array of articles.
???	This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] Retiled = irrelevant?

It seems to me that these two sentences: "When the damage was repaired the platform walls were not retiled. In 1994 the station was renovated and the missing tiles were replaced." - add up to "so there is nothing to see there." It *used* to be relevant, before 94, which is why it's mentioned in older history books, but now there is the plaque, as noted in this article, but nothing else. I suggest that both sentences should be removed. What do you think? 82.45.248.177 01:54, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

I agree --IsarSteve 04:42, 27 November 2006 (UTC)