Talk:Billy Cannon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Billy Cannon article.
Article policies
This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

Contents

[edit] punt return

how come there is nothing about his punt return verse ole miss in 1959?(it supposedely won him the heisman)

Feel free to put somethign about it. Sf46 (talk) 14:53, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot (talk) 18:10, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Billy Cannon at LSU.jpg

Image:Billy Cannon at LSU.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:15, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Criminal issue

There seems to be a developing edit war over whether or not to keep or delete the crinimal category tag in this article. As someone sugegsted maybe this needs to be discussed and consensus gained on the subject.

Neutral While I do agree that Billy did get caught in criminal activity, I don't think it is what made him notable. I think his football career is the main focus of his fame. If the criminal category is replaced, I think the information about his criminal activity needs to be expanded to justify it. Sf46 (talk) 14:57, 20 April 2008 (UTC) Delete criminal category tag. After seeing the definition of the category, this perosn clearly does not belong in it. This is the same for many others being erroneously put into this category by User:John celona. Sf46 (talk) 15:20, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

There is already something going on at Category talk:American criminals. Someone has filed a request for comment, and we are currently waiting for a response. J.delanoygabsadds 01:31, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
For the record this article was placed (by another user) in the category 2 years ago so there is no "controversy". The conviction is well-sourced. John celona (talk) 17:36, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
As stated by David in DC on the category discussion page: "Here's what the Category description says: "For inclusion in this category, a person must have been duly, lawfully, and finally convicted by one or more United States federal courts or State courts (excluding impeachments, convictions that have subsequently been fully pardoned, cases resulting in a conviction that have been sealed or expunged, or cases resulting in a conviction that have been subsequently dismissed and/or reopened with a new trial), can claim notability solely because of the crime [emphasis added], or else the person must have committed notable and unambiguously verifiable criminal acts, but have gone unconvicted for reasons other than lack of proof such as death during the commission of the crime where the allegation of criminal activity was undisputed, undisputed confession, death during appeal where guilt was undisputed, or being a fugitive from justice where original guilt was undisputed."
That demonstrates to me that this person does not fit the category as per the definition. Sf46 (talk) 04:30, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Removal of a couple sections

I took out a couple of sections for several reasons. 1) They needed heavy editing, 2) One section really needed some references, 3) They should be integrated into the later life section; and finally 4) The fan cheering for Billy at homecoming, does that really equal him being forgiven? Also, why would it be necessary to include it in the encyclopedia article (especially in its own section)? Carface (talk) 01:13, 2 May 2008 (UTC)