Talk:Beriev
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions. | ||||||||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. | ||||||||
|
|||||||||
 |
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Russia. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was no move Part Deux 19:11, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Requested move
Beriev Aircraft Company → Beriev — more common usage; brings in line with other ex-Soviet design bureaus —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 23:53, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Survey
- Add * '''Support''' or * '''Oppose''' on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
- Support —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 23:53, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose —ISasha 13:43, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment - WP:RM is not a vote, but a discussion, just like WP:AFD. Please state your reasoning. Patstuarttalk|edits 03:43, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- I was the one who called the vote; That RFV stated my reason. —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 05:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose - their English web site uses the full form --ArmadilloFromHellGateBridge 07:54, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose, the full form is much clearer, unlikely to be confused with one of their products or its founder. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gene Nygaard (talk • contribs)
[edit] Discussion
- Add any additional comments:
What's the problem with moving, as long as you keep a redirect from the present title? go ahead, no need to poll... I'm not moving it myself as I don't care which of the two ways it is named. --BACbKA 09:27, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit] The above requested move discussion
I have asked that Beriev (the redirect page) be deleted so that this article can be moved there. As I tried putting in the edit for the move (before being told that page already exists there), if it is good enough for Boeing, Ilyushin, Tupolev, Kamov, Yakovlev, need I go on, then it is good enough for Beriev. --Russavia 11:24, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
