Belgian Revolution
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Belgian Revolution was a conflict in the United Kingdom of the Netherlands that began with a riot in Brussels in August 1830 and eventually led to the establishment of an independent, Roman Catholic and neutral Belgium (William I, king of the Netherlands, would refuse to recognize a Belgian state until 1839, when he had to yield under pressure by the Treaty of London).
The Netherlands overthrew Napoleonic rule in 1813. In the Anglo-Dutch Treaty of 1814 the names "United Provinces of the Netherlands" and "United Netherlands" were used. After the defeat of Napoleon in 1815, the Congress of Vienna created a kingdom for the House of Orange-Nassau, combining the United Provinces of the Netherlands with the former Austrian Netherlands, in order to create a strong buffer state north of France. Symptomatic of the tenor of diplomatic bargaining at Vienna was the early proposal to reward Prussia for its staunch fight against Napoleon with the former Habsburg territory. Then, when the British insisted on retaining formerly Dutch Ceylon and the Cape Colony, which they had seized while the Netherlands was ruled by Napoleon, the new kingdom of the Netherlands was compensated with these southern provinces. The union, called the United Kingdom of the Netherlands, harkened back to 16th century dynastic possessions but proved to be unworkable in the 19th century.
Contents |
[edit] Causes of the Revolution
The revolution had many causes; surely of importance was the treatment of the French-speaking Catholic Walloons in the Dutch-dominated United Kingdom of the Netherlands, and the difference of religion between the Belgians and their Dutch king. However, the main cause of the Belgian Revolution was the domination of the Dutch over the economic, political, and social institutions of the United Provinces. Although Belgium had nearly double the population of the Netherlands, it was assigned the same number of representatives in the States General. The Belgians had little influence over the economy and resented Dutch control. At the most basic level, the Dutch were for free trade, while less-developed local industries in Belgium called for the protection of tariffs. Free trade lowered the price of bread, made from wheat imported through the reviving port of Antwerp; at the same time, these imports from the Baltic depressed agriculture in Belgian grain-growing regions.
The more numerous Dutch provinces represented a majority in the United Kingdom of the Netherlands' elected Lower Assembly, and therefore the more populous Belgians felt significantly under-represented. However, the Belgians saw the main political domination in the fact that King William I was Dutch, lived in the present day Netherlands, and largely ignored the Belgian demands for greater self-determination. His more progressive and amiable representative living in Brussels, which was meant to be a twin capital, was Prince William, later King William II, who had some popularity among the upper class but none among Walloon peasants and workers.
Another cause of the Belgian Revolution was the Belgian people's faith, Roman Catholicism, which conflicted with that of their DUTCH KING, and his belief in Calvinism. Although there were and still are many Roman Catholics in the present-day Netherlands, the Belgians saw themselves as purely Catholic and demanded a higher role for the Church, and for Catholics, in their government. In a sense, the Belgian Revolution was a revolution of a French-speaking upper and middle class that exchanged Dutch hegemony for French-speaking hegemony. The Belgian Revolution of 1830 crystallised this antagonism, with the final arrangements favoring the French-speakers. French became the official language; Dutch, as well as Walloon, were banned in schools.
To be sure freedom of the press, the burden of Holland's national debt, taxes on staples such as flour and meat, a Dutch-favored civil service system, limited prospects for young Belgian professionals and intelligentsia, and a refusal to accept a truly democratic parliamentary regime also fanned the fires of revolt. [1]
[edit] A Night at the Opera
Catholic partisans watched with excitement the unfolding of the July Revolution in France, details of which were swiftly reported in the newspapers. On August 25, 1830, at the Theatre de la Monmiac in Brussels , an uprising followed a performance of Daniel Auber's La Muette de Portici, a sentimental and patriotic opera suited to fire National Romanticism, for it was set against Masaniello's uprising against the Spanish masters of Naples in the 17th century. The duet, "Amour sacré de la patrie," (Sacred love of Fatherland) with Adolphe Nourrit in the tenor role, engendered a riot that became the spark for the Belgian Revolution. The crowd poured into the streets after the performance, shouting patriotic slogans, and swiftly took possession of government buildings. The coming days saw an explosion of the desperate and exasperated proletariat of Brussels.
The affable and moderate Crown Prince William, who represented the monarchy in Brussels, was convinced by the Estates-General on September 1 that the administrative separation of north and south was the only viable solution to the crisis. His father rejected the terms of accommodation that he proposed.
King William I attempted to restore the established order by force, but the 6000 Dutch troops under Prince Frederick were unable to retake Brussels in bloody street fighting (September 23 to 26). Any opportunity to quell the breech was lost on Sept 26 when a National Congress was summoned to draw-up a Constitution and a provisional government was established under Charles Rogier. A Declaration of Independence followed on 4 October. On 12/20/1830 The London Conference declared the Kingdom of the Netherlands dissolved and a month later recognized Belgiums independance. On February 7, 1831, the Belgian Constitution was proclaimed and the separation from the Dutch was a fact. Over the 350 years of shared connections as varied Low Country manifestations the two peoples had drifted apart and after 15 years of tension, the marriage was over.
[edit] A Constitutional Monarchy
The Belgian Congress chose the second son of Louis-Phillipe, the duke of Nemours, to be king of Belgium. However, the French king, heeding the advice of Lord Palmerston of the British foreign office, repudiated the offer. Lord Palmerston and The Great Powers desired a strong leader to prevent Belgium from falling under the control of France, and to prevent the outbreak of war. . Erasme Louis Surlet de Chokier was appointed Regent of Belgium on February 25, 1831. On June 4 the Congress chose Prince Leopold of Saxe-Coburg as king. A strong and political choice as Leopold was not only talented and capable but well connected to both Britain and France. Leopold I took the oath as King of the Belgians on July 21, 1831.
[edit] Ten Days Campaign
King William was not satisfied with the settlement drawn up in London and did not accept Belgiums claim of independence: it divided his kingdom and drastically effected his Treasury. In August 1831 (from 2 to 12), the Dutch army, headed by the Dutch princes, invaded Belgium, in the so-called "Ten Days Campaign", and defeated a make-shift Belgian force near Hasselt and Leuven. Only the appearance of a French army under Marshal Gérard (and with British approval) caused the Dutch to stop their advance. While the victorious initial campaign gave the Dutch an advantageous position in subsequent negotiations, the Dutch were compelled to agree to an indefinite armistice. It was not until April of 1839 that William stubbornly recognized a frontier which, with the exception of Limburg and Luxembourg, was basically the frontier of 1790.
[edit] European Powers
The European Powers were divided over the Belgian cry for independence. The Napoleonic Wars were still fresh in the memories of Europeans, so when the French, under the recently installed July Monarchy, supported Belgian independence, the other powers unsurprisingly supported the continued union of the Provinces of the Netherlands. Russia, Prussia, Austria, and Great Britain all supported the somewhat authoritarian Dutch king, many fearing the French would annex an independent Belgium (particularly the British: see Talleyrand partition plan for Belgium). However, in the end, none of the European powers sent troops to aid the Dutch government, partly because of rebellions within some of their own borders (the Russians were occupied with the November Uprising in Poland and Prussia was saddled with war debt.)
[edit] Independent Belgium
On April 19, 1839 the Treaty of London signed by the European powers (including the Netherlands) recognized Belgium as an independent and neutral country comprising West Flanders, East Flanders, Brabant, Antwerp, Hainaut, Namur, and Liège, as well as half of Luxembourg and Limburg.
The Dutch army, however, held onto Maastricht, and as a result the Netherlands kept the eastern half of Limburg and its large coalfields.
[edit] Accession of King Leopold
See Leopold I of Belgium.
[edit] After the Break-up
 |
This section does not cite any references or sources. (July 2007) Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unverifiable material may be challenged and removed. |
[edit] Economic changes
The independence of Belgium was a disaster for the important industrial city of Ghent. In 1829 the city's cotton industry processed 7.5 million kg cotton, while in 1832 this was only 2 million kg. A direct consequence of the break-up was unemployment for most of the labourers. Wages fell to 30% of their 1829 level.
For the harbour city of Antwerp the disaster was even bigger. Trade with the colonies reduced to zero and the number of ships that entered the port fell to 398. In contrast, in 1829 1030 ships entered Antwerp, carrying 129,000 tons, double the amount of Rotterdam and Amsterdam together.
[edit] See also
- The Belgian revolution of 1830 was recently depicted in one of the highest value Belgian coins ever minted, the 100 euro 175 Years of Belgium Coin. The obverse shows a depict of the famous painting "Scene of the September days in 1830"
[edit] References
- ^ Great Events from History, The 19th Century, Vol I, pgs 474-476, Dissatisfaction with Dutch rule prompted a Belgian revolt.
[edit] External links
