Talk:Be Your Own Pet
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Members and Former Members sections
Are these sections needed when this information is present in the infobox? If not, or if there is no response, they should be deleted. Dokijic 12:28, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- They include who plays what. Though the article itself also mentions this. 149.159.113.205 07:20, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
-
- That makes sense really :) Dokijic 09:28, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Karen O comparisson
While I'm certain a quick search would pull up plenty of Karen O comparisons, how is either woman's stage presence "non-traditional" ? What tradition are they defying (acts like The Supremes? Tiffany? Yoko Ono?) and was it ever really applied in the punk/garage rock setting? We could as easily say Jemina is following the long tradition of frontwomen like Patti Smith. 149.159.113.205 07:20, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Not Rocket Science?
Can anyone verify this information is correct? (regarding BYOP's 2nd album) Maps15 15:03, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Requested move
be your own PET → Be Your Own Pet — naming conventions, see WP:NC#Album titles and band names PEJL 10:20, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
This article has been renamed from be your own PET to Be Your Own Pet as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 14:49, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Classification
This article has been assessed as a start. Its importance for WikiProject Tennessee is assessed as low same as for Wikiproject Alternative Music. Capitalistroadster 07:21, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Byop newpromo.jpg
Image:Byop newpromo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 08:35, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Byop logo.PNG
Image:Byop logo.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 18:52, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] the page on jemina pearl abegg was removed.
why is this? there was one, it seemed to meet notability. Caribouforyou (talk) 02:42, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] whats up with the bio?
it reads like it was pulled directly from a magazine and cites absouletly no sources. im not an avid article editor but this seems like a pretty major oversight. -adum —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.125.160.51 (talk) 22:22, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

