User talk:BballJones

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Condoleezza Rice 2 Wikipedia:WikiProject Law 3 Controversial Edits 4 Sockpuppetry case 5 Stem Cell Debate - you may like Debatepedia

[edit] Condoleezza Rice

Nice work on balancing the criticism section. I think enough progress has been made to lift the POV tag. What do you think? OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:20, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

I think that none of us are being paid very well by our bosses in the Bush administration. :) --ElKevbo 16:31, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

I agree! -- --BballJones 20:05, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject Law

That would depend on your experience - are you involved in the law? If you're a lawyer, the best place to start is looking at articles relating to year area of specialization. There are also missing legal terms and wanted law articles. Also, at Portal:Law, we are always looking for good suggestions for featured articles, biographies, cases, and images to rotate in. There are a number of other law-related lists on my user page that need filling out, so please have at them! bd2412 T 02:28, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Controversial Edits

Hello, BballJones. I do not feel that trying to get rid of material that is conducive to non-neutral POV, or getting rid of material inserted in an attempt to add commentary or analysis (read as original research) should necessarily be something that merits discussion. However, if both disagreeing parties insist on their material, that would be an appropriate time to go to the discussion page. --64.132.163.178 12:42, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

I reviewed those edits of that other editor and they were legitimate, appropriate edits. --BballJones 22:47, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/BballJones for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Deet 00:47, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Stem Cell Debate - you may like Debatepedia

Noticed your many contributions and interest in the stem cell controversy article. Just thought I would point you to the Debatepedia (wiki debate encyclopedia) article on stem cell research. [1] You may find this a better forum for presenting the different, third-party points of views in these debates. Loudsirens 23:51, 7 December 2006 (UTC)