From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Unless otherwise specified, I will respond to you on the page where the conversation started, whether that is your talk page or mine. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Home |
Talk |
Contributions |
Blocks |
Deletions |
Moves |
Protections |
monobook.js |
Userspace |
|
|
Archive box
|
|
Archives |
- Apr 06 - Jan 07
- Jan 07 - Jun 07
- Jul 07 - Nov 07
- Nov 07 - Feb 08
- Feb 07 - Mar 08
- April 08
- May 08
|
{{Talkback|Balloonman|RE: }}
| Username |
S |
O |
N |
S% |
Ending |
Duplicates? |
Report |
| Epbr123 |
150 |
2 |
1 |
99% |
11 June 17:21 |
No |
Details |
Last updated 22:00, 10 June 2008 (UTC) by Tangobot
|
|
POTENTIAL NOMs |
| Potential Noms |
Checked out |
Inquired |
| Elcobbola |
|
|
| Laser brain |
|
|
| Karanacs |
Would make a great admin. Has potential---including edits in a broad spectrum of areas. Has the diversity of edits. But reading page, I don't get the sense that she needs the tools or would really appreciate them. |
|
| Kablammo |
|
|
| Mike Searson |
|
|
| RelHistBuff |
Solid Candidate, but has significant holes. |
|
| Ealdgyth |
|
|
| Maralia |
|
|
| BuddingJournalist |
|
|
| Tvoz |
Would be a great candidate, but isn't interested. |
5/24/08 |
| Wasted Time R |
Excellent candidate, should pass RfA easily. |
Not interested 18 May 2008. |
| BrianBoulton |
|
|
| Moni3 |
Excellent candidate, just doesn't see need for tools. |
Moni would be a good admin even if she pooped on a bot. Is interested, but will wait a month or two. |
| Eubulides |
Excellent editor, excellent demeanor, but no experience outside of article building. |
|
