Talk:Back in Black (song)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Songs because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove the {{Stubclass}} template from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WikiProjectSongs}} template, removing the {{Stubclass}} template from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
Flag
Portal
Back in Black (song) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
This article is supported by WikiProject Australian music. See also P:AUSMUSIC.

Contents

[edit] Signature song

I noticed that "You shook Me all night Long" was counted as ACDC's signature song, but when you think about it, isn't back in black more their signature song? I mean, when you think of ACDC most people remember Back In Black before You Shook Me All Night Long....could it be possible to swpa the song's places? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaji132007 (talkcontribs) 04:34, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Genre

It's definitely not heavy metal.

  • First, thanks for putting this in a formatted section. Second, thanks for signing your post. Third, yeah, you're completely right, and All Music Guide, Rolling Stone, Q Magazine, VH1, MTV, Metal-Rules, pretty much every music critic is wrong. We should definitely listen to anonymous Gods of information like you. 70.226.96.31 01:09, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] F word?

I was listening to this song once, and I suspect this song used the F word in the line "I'm beating the ", Lyricsfreak,com claims tha word they say is "flack{", can anyone tell me how good a source Lyricsfreak.com is? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.3.2.130 (talk) 23:57, 2 May 2007 (UTC).


Removed this:

Since the Back In Black section on "The Daily Show" uses a soundalike, not the actual AC/DC song.

[edit] Bon's Version

Has anyone ever heard the Bon Scott version of this song? I dont know when the song was written, but it was obviously sometime before Feb. 19, 1980. Jameywiki 15:15, 26 September 2007 (UTC) I take that statement back. After giving it a critical listen, I think its a good possibility that it is not Bon singing, but maybe a cover band. See the discussion at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bon_Scott Jameywiki 15:32, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

-I thought I have the Bon Scott version- it certainly sounds like him. I thought Bon had already started some of the songs on back in black when he died. Didn't he write the song back in black? It is in my opinion better than the album version- the album version is just a cover version of a Bon song? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.49.160.1 (talk) 14:41, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Ac-dcsuptouredition.JPG

Image:Ac-dcsuptouredition.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)