Talk:Baby Phat

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fashion WikiProject This article is within the scope of the Fashion WikiProject. Please work to improve this article, or visit our project page to find other ways of helping. Thanks!
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article is on a subject of Low-importance within fashion.

Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

this whole article is not neutral. it needs to be checked and fixed

of the article was quoted verbatim from http://www.babyphat.com/aboutus.php, and is undoubtedly copyrighted. I removed it because Wikipedia can't contain copyrighted material. I left a link to source page. 

Another problem with the deleted text is that it is written in a glowing PR style. Wikipedia is an encylopedia; it doesn't contain ads. If someone is interested, they could rewrite some of the text in a neutral encyclopedic style. That would avoid both objections.

This article sucks, i feel like i'm reading the company bio sheet at a stock holders meeting. stop trying to get me to buy stock in your company! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.172.229.109 (talk) 01:56, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

I also removed someone's failed attempt at inserting the Baby Phat Kids logo. This is also undoubtedly copyrighted, but you might be able to make a case for fair use, see Wikipedia:Fair use. If so you can upload it and reference it in Wikipedia images. --teb728 03:29, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Logo baby phat.jpg

Image:Logo baby phat.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:32, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

There is no such thing as a "baby phat vibrator" or a "baby phat pocket protector". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.118.85.226 (talk) 05:31, 23 September 2007 (UTC)


baby phat rules!!!! :] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.184.242.182 (talk) 19:44, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] u are so kool

i luv u so much i luv ur kidz they are so kute and im lokking fowaed of seeing u —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.21.253.32 (talk) 13:23, 1 June 2008 (UTC)